Suppr超能文献

白蛋白之争。

The albumin controversy.

作者信息

Uhing Michael R

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

Clin Perinatol. 2004 Sep;31(3):475-88. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2004.03.018.

Abstract

There are relatively few studies of albumin use in neonates and children, with most showing no consistent benefit compared with the use of crystalloid solutions. Certainly, albumin treatment is not indicated for treatment of hypoalbuminemia alone. Studies also show that albumin is not indicated in neonates for the initial treatment of hypotension, respiratory distress, or partial exchange transfusions. In adults, albumin is not considered to be the initial therapy for hypovolemia, burn injury, or nutritional supplementation. Based on the evidence, albumin should be used rarely in the neonatal ICU. Albumin may be indicated in the treatment of hypovolemia only after crystalloid infusion has failed. In patients with acute hemorrhagic shock, albumin may be used with crystalloids when blood products are not available immediately. Inpatients with acute or continuing losses of albumin and normal capillary permeability and lymphatic function, such as during persistent thoracostomy tube or surgical site drainage, albumin supplementation will prevent the development of hypoalbuminemia, and possibly edema formation. This has not been studied systematically, however. In patients with hypoalbuminemia and increased capillary permeability, albumin supplementation often leads to greater albumin leakage across the capillary membrane, contributing to edema formation without improvement in outcome. As the disease process improves and capillary permeability normalizes, albumin supplementation may accelerate recovery, but long-term benefits of albumin treatment usually cannot be demonstrated. These patients will recover whether or not albumin is administered.

摘要

关于新生儿和儿童使用白蛋白的研究相对较少,大多数研究表明,与使用晶体溶液相比,白蛋白并无一致的益处。当然,白蛋白治疗并非单独用于治疗低白蛋白血症。研究还表明,白蛋白不适用于新生儿低血压、呼吸窘迫或部分换血疗法的初始治疗。在成人中,白蛋白不被视为低血容量、烧伤或营养补充的初始治疗方法。基于现有证据,新生儿重症监护病房应极少使用白蛋白。仅在晶体液输注失败后,白蛋白才可用于治疗低血容量。在急性失血性休克患者中,若无法立即获得血液制品,白蛋白可与晶体液联合使用。在白蛋白急性或持续丢失且毛细血管通透性和淋巴功能正常的患者中,如在持续胸腔闭式引流管引流或手术部位引流期间,补充白蛋白可预防低白蛋白血症的发生,并可能防止水肿形成。然而,这尚未得到系统研究。在低白蛋白血症且毛细血管通透性增加的患者中,补充白蛋白通常会导致更多白蛋白透过毛细血管膜渗漏,从而导致水肿形成,且预后并无改善。随着疾病进程改善且毛细血管通透性恢复正常,补充白蛋白可能会加速康复,但通常无法证明白蛋白治疗具有长期益处。无论是否给予白蛋白,这些患者都会康复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验