Suppr超能文献

对离散和情境刺激的线索诱发恐惧反应:刺激方式的影响取决于大鼠品系。

CER to discrete and contextual stimuli: effects of stimulus modality depend on strain of rat.

作者信息

Norman C, Cassaday H J

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2004 Sep 30;82(4):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.05.013.

Abstract

Strain differences in perception, cognition and affect have been found to interact with the effect of experimental treatments on learning. The present study tested Dark Agouti (DA) and Wistar rats in conditioning to discrete and contextual stimuli, for strain differences in conditioned emotional response (CER) and effects of stimulus modality. A Pavlovian trace-conditioning procedure was used in which a discrete target stimulus (flashing light or tone, counterbalanced across groups) was paired either contiguously or at a 30-s trace with footshock. Contextual conditioning was assessed using a background (continuously presented) experimental stimulus (alternate to that used as target). Experiment 1 used 5 x 0.5 mA, 0.5-s footshock and Experiment 2 used 2 x 0.5 mA, 1-s footshock. In both experiments, conditioning to the discrete (target) and background stimuli interacted with strain of rat and stimulus modality. For conditioning to the target stimulus, the trace-conditioning effect (of relatively greater suppression in contiguously conditioned than trace-conditioned groups) differed by stimulus and strain. It was greater for the Wistar strain with the flashing light stimulus and for the DA strain with the click stimulus (although the latter was not significant in Experiment 1). In addition, suppression to the background stimulus was affected by stimulus modality for the DA but not Wistar strain in both experiments. DAs conditioned more to the click than the light as background, whereas there was no difference by stimulus modality for Wistars, although the exact pattern of how this stimulus modality effect was mediated differed between experiments. These results demonstrate that stimulus modality can be an issue when considering apparent strain differences in conditioning.

摘要

已发现,在感知、认知和情感方面的品系差异会与实验处理对学习的影响相互作用。本研究对深色刺豚鼠(DA)和Wistar大鼠进行离散刺激和情境刺激的条件反射测试,以探究条件性情绪反应(CER)的品系差异和刺激方式的影响。采用了巴甫洛夫痕迹条件反射程序,其中离散的目标刺激(闪烁光或音调,在各实验组中平衡)与足部电击连续配对或在30秒的痕迹间隔后配对。使用背景(持续呈现)实验刺激(与用作目标的刺激交替)评估情境条件反射。实验1使用5×0.5毫安、0.5秒的足部电击,实验2使用2×0.5毫安、1秒的足部电击。在两个实验中,对离散(目标)和背景刺激的条件反射都与大鼠品系和刺激方式相互作用。对于目标刺激的条件反射,痕迹条件反射效应(连续条件反射组比痕迹条件反射组的抑制作用相对更大)因刺激和品系而异。对于Wistar品系,闪烁光刺激的效应更大;对于DA品系,点击刺激的效应更大(尽管在实验1中后者不显著)。此外,在两个实验中,DA品系对背景刺激的抑制受刺激方式影响,而Wistar品系则不受影响。作为背景时,DA品系对点击的条件反射比对光的条件反射更多,而Wistar品系在刺激方式上没有差异,尽管两个实验中这种刺激方式效应的具体介导模式有所不同。这些结果表明,在考虑条件反射中明显的品系差异时,刺激方式可能是一个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验