Dahaba Ashraf A, Mattweber Markus, Fuchs Andreas, Zenz Wilhelm, Rehak Peter H, List Werner F, Metzler Helfried
*Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and †Department of Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Computing Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, Austria.
Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):781-787. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132997.19872.BC.
Facial electromyographic activity and neuromuscular block could influence bispectral index (BIS) depth of anesthesia monitoring. In this study we examined, in 30 patients undergoing general surgical procedures, the effect of different stages of neuromuscular block on BIS monitoring and compared the conventional A-2000 BIS trade mark (BIS(3.4)) with the new BIS-XP trade mark (BIS(XP)). At deep surgical anesthesia BIS(3.4) of approximately 40, under a propofol 3.61 microg/mL target-controlled infusion and a 0.15-0.3 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) remifentanil infusion, mivacurium 0.15 mg/kg was administered. The onset of neuromuscular block triggered a brief transient odd divergence in response that manifested as a BIS(3.4) increase from 43 +/- 4 to 49 +/- 7 (P = 0.007) and a BIS(XP) decline from 41 +/- 3 to 35 +/- 3 (P = 0.003) at 1 +/- 0.2 min. Then, 2.5 +/- 1 min after mivacurium administration, both monitors returned to baseline values of 43 +/- 5 and 40 +/- 4, respectively. After that, BIS(3.4) and BIS(XP) did not significantly change during complete neuromuscular block or during various levels of neuromuscular recovery. At all phases, BIS(XP) was significantly lower than BIS(3.4). Our study indicated that the BIS(3.4)/BIS(XP) bias and the wide limits of agreement do not allow values given by the two monitors to be used interchangeably.
面部肌电图活动和神经肌肉阻滞可能会影响脑电双频指数(BIS)麻醉深度监测。在本研究中,我们对30例接受普通外科手术的患者进行了检查,观察神经肌肉阻滞不同阶段对BIS监测的影响,并将传统的A - 2000 BIS商标(BIS(3.4))与新的BIS - XP商标(BIS(XP))进行比较。在深度外科麻醉状态下,在丙泊酚3.61微克/毫升靶控输注和瑞芬太尼0.15 - 0.3微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹输注的情况下,给予米库氯铵0.15毫克/千克,此时BIS(3.4)约为40。神经肌肉阻滞开始时引发了短暂的异常偏差反应,表现为在1±0.2分钟时,BIS(3.4)从43±4增加到49±7(P = 0.007),BIS(XP)从41±3下降到35±3(P = 0.003)。然后,在给予米库氯铵2.5±1分钟后,两个监测仪分别恢复到基线值43±5和40±4。此后,在完全神经肌肉阻滞或不同程度的神经肌肉恢复过程中,BIS(3.4)和BIS(XP)均无显著变化。在所有阶段,BIS(XP)均显著低于BIS(3.4)。我们的研究表明,BIS(3.4)/BIS(XP)偏差及较大的一致性界限使得这两种监测仪给出的值不能互换使用。