Suppr超能文献

一项II期双盲随机研究,比较口服芦荟与安慰剂预防头颈部肿瘤患者放射性口腔黏膜炎的效果。

Phase II double-blind randomized study comparing oral aloe vera versus placebo to prevent radiation-related mucositis in patients with head-and-neck neoplasms.

作者信息

Su Catherine K, Mehta Vivek, Ravikumar Lavanya, Shah Rachit, Pinto Harlan, Halpern Jerry, Koong Albert, Goffinet Don, Le Quynh-Thu

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5302, USA.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Sep 1;60(1):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.012.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In a single-institution, double-blind, prospective, randomized trial, we determined whether oral aloe vera gel can reduce radiation-induced mucositis in head-and-neck cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We randomized 58 head-and-neck cancer patients between oral aloe vera and placebo. To be included in this Phase II protocol, patients had to be treated with radiotherapy with curative intent at Stanford University between February 1999 and March 2002. We examined patients biweekly for mucositis at 15 head-and-neck subsites and administered quality-of-life questionnaires.

RESULTS

Patients in the aloe and placebo groups were statistically identical in baseline characteristics. By the end of treatment, the two groups were also statistically identical in maximal grade of toxicity, duration of Grade 2 or worse mucositis, quality-of-life scores, percentage of weight loss, use of pain medications, hydration requirement, oral infections, and prolonged radiation breaks.

CONCLUSION

In our randomized study, oral aloe vera was not a beneficial adjunct to head-and-neck radiotherapy. The mean quality-of-life scores were greater in the aloe vera group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Oral aloe vera did not improve tolerance to head-and-neck radiotherapy, decrease mucositis, reduce soreness, or otherwise improve patient well-being.

摘要

目的

在一项单机构、双盲、前瞻性、随机试验中,我们确定口服芦荟凝胶是否能减轻头颈癌患者的放射性黏膜炎。

方法与材料

我们将58名头颈癌患者随机分为口服芦荟组和安慰剂组。要纳入本II期方案,患者必须在1999年2月至2002年3月期间于斯坦福大学接受根治性放疗。我们每两周检查患者15个头颈亚部位的黏膜炎情况,并发放生活质量问卷。

结果

芦荟组和安慰剂组患者的基线特征在统计学上无差异。治疗结束时,两组在最大毒性分级、2级或更严重黏膜炎的持续时间、生活质量评分、体重减轻百分比、止痛药物使用情况、补液需求、口腔感染以及放疗中断时间延长等方面在统计学上也无差异。

结论

在我们的随机研究中,口服芦荟并非头颈放疗的有益辅助手段。芦荟组的平均生活质量评分更高,但差异无统计学意义。口服芦荟并未提高对头颈放疗的耐受性,未减轻黏膜炎,未减轻疼痛,也未改善患者的整体状况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验