Su Catherine K, Mehta Vivek, Ravikumar Lavanya, Shah Rachit, Pinto Harlan, Halpern Jerry, Koong Albert, Goffinet Don, Le Quynh-Thu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5302, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Sep 1;60(1):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.012.
In a single-institution, double-blind, prospective, randomized trial, we determined whether oral aloe vera gel can reduce radiation-induced mucositis in head-and-neck cancer patients.
We randomized 58 head-and-neck cancer patients between oral aloe vera and placebo. To be included in this Phase II protocol, patients had to be treated with radiotherapy with curative intent at Stanford University between February 1999 and March 2002. We examined patients biweekly for mucositis at 15 head-and-neck subsites and administered quality-of-life questionnaires.
Patients in the aloe and placebo groups were statistically identical in baseline characteristics. By the end of treatment, the two groups were also statistically identical in maximal grade of toxicity, duration of Grade 2 or worse mucositis, quality-of-life scores, percentage of weight loss, use of pain medications, hydration requirement, oral infections, and prolonged radiation breaks.
In our randomized study, oral aloe vera was not a beneficial adjunct to head-and-neck radiotherapy. The mean quality-of-life scores were greater in the aloe vera group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Oral aloe vera did not improve tolerance to head-and-neck radiotherapy, decrease mucositis, reduce soreness, or otherwise improve patient well-being.
在一项单机构、双盲、前瞻性、随机试验中,我们确定口服芦荟凝胶是否能减轻头颈癌患者的放射性黏膜炎。
我们将58名头颈癌患者随机分为口服芦荟组和安慰剂组。要纳入本II期方案,患者必须在1999年2月至2002年3月期间于斯坦福大学接受根治性放疗。我们每两周检查患者15个头颈亚部位的黏膜炎情况,并发放生活质量问卷。
芦荟组和安慰剂组患者的基线特征在统计学上无差异。治疗结束时,两组在最大毒性分级、2级或更严重黏膜炎的持续时间、生活质量评分、体重减轻百分比、止痛药物使用情况、补液需求、口腔感染以及放疗中断时间延长等方面在统计学上也无差异。
在我们的随机研究中,口服芦荟并非头颈放疗的有益辅助手段。芦荟组的平均生活质量评分更高,但差异无统计学意义。口服芦荟并未提高对头颈放疗的耐受性,未减轻黏膜炎,未减轻疼痛,也未改善患者的整体状况。