Tauscher Johannes, Hussain Tabasum, Agid Ofer, Verhoeff N Paul L G, Wilson Alan A, Houle Sylvain, Remington Gary, Zipursky Robert B, Kapur Shitij
University of Toronto Department of Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Program.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;161(9):1620-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1620.
Clozapine, the prototype of atypical antipsychotics, remains unique in its efficacy in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. Its affinity for dopamine D(4) receptors, serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism, effects on the noradrenergic system, and its relatively moderate occupancy of D(2) receptors are unlikely to be the critical mechanism underlying its efficacy. In an attempt to elucidate the molecular/synaptic mechanism underlying clozapine's distinctiveness in refractory schizophrenia, the authors studied the in vivo D(1) and D(2) receptor profile of clozapine compared with other atypical antipsychotics.
Positron emission tomography with the radioligands [(11)C]SCH23390 and [(11)C]raclopride was used to investigate D(1) and D(2) receptor occupancy in vivo in 25 schizophrenia patients receiving atypical antipsychotic treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone.
Mean striatal D(1) occupancies ranged from 55% with clozapine to 12% with quetiapine (rank order: clozapine > olanzapine > risperidone > quetiapine). The striatal D(2) occupancy ranged from 81% with risperidone to 30% with quetiapine (rank order: risperidone > olanzapine > clozapine > quetiapine). The ratio of striatal D(1)/D(2) occupancy was significantly higher for clozapine (0.88) relative to olanzapine (0.54), quetiapine (0.41), or risperidone (0.31).
Among the atypical antipsychotics, clozapine appears to have a simultaneous and equivalent occupancy of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors. Whether its effect on D(1) receptors represents agonism or antagonism is not yet clear, as this issue is still unresolved in the preclinical arena. This distinctive effect on D(1)/D(2) receptors may be responsible for clozapine's unique effectiveness in patients with schizophrenia refractory to other typical and atypical antipsychotics.
氯氮平作为非典型抗精神病药物的原型,在治疗难治性精神分裂症方面疗效独特。它对多巴胺D(4)受体的亲和力、5-羟色胺5-HT(2A)受体拮抗作用、对去甲肾上腺素能系统的影响以及对D(2)受体相对适度的占据情况,都不太可能是其疗效的关键机制。为了阐明氯氮平在难治性精神分裂症中独特性的分子/突触机制,作者研究了氯氮平与其他非典型抗精神病药物相比的体内D(1)和D(2)受体分布情况。
使用放射性配体[(11)C]SCH23390和[(11)C]雷氯必利进行正电子发射断层扫描,以研究25例接受氯氮平、奥氮平、喹硫平或利培酮非典型抗精神病药物治疗的精神分裂症患者体内D(1)和D(2)受体的占据情况。
纹状体D(1)受体平均占据率范围从氯氮平的55%到喹硫平的12%(顺序为:氯氮平>奥氮平>利培酮>喹硫平)。纹状体D(2)受体占据率范围从利培酮的81%到喹硫平的30%(顺序为:利培酮>奥氮平>氯氮平>喹硫平)。氯氮平的纹状体D(1)/D(2)受体占据率比值(0.88)相对于奥氮平(0.54)、喹硫平(0.41)或利培酮(0.31)显著更高。
在非典型抗精神病药物中,氯氮平似乎能同时且等量地占据多巴胺D(1)和D(2)受体。其对D(1)受体的作用是激动还是拮抗尚不清楚,因为这一问题在临床前研究领域仍未解决。这种对D(1)/D(2)受体的独特作用可能是氯氮平对其他典型和非典型抗精神病药物难治的精神分裂症患者具有独特疗效的原因。