Germolec D R, Kashon M, Nyska A, Kuper C F, Portier C, Kommineni C, Johnson K A, Luster M I
Laboratory of Molecular Toxicology/National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Toxicol Sci. 2004 Dec;82(2):504-14. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfh271. Epub 2004 Sep 1.
The accuracy of extended histopathology to detect immunotoxic chemicals in female B6C3F1 mice was evaluated under the auspices of the National Toxicology Program (NTP). A workgroup was formed consisting of four pathologists who conducted extended histopathological evaluation of lymphoid tissues obtained from a subset of NTP toxicology studies, in which previously detailed immunotoxicity assessment was performed. In addition, a positive control data set of three known immunosuppressive agents, one negative control data set, and an additional negative control group composed of the vehicle only treated groups were included. Data obtained from extended histopathology evaluations were compared to more traditional immune test results (both functional and nonfunctional) from previously conducted immunotoxicity assessments. Analyses of the data indicated that the ability to identify immunotoxic chemicals using histological endpoints decreased linearly as the level of stringency used to determine significant histopathological changes increased. A relatively high (80%) accuracy level was achieved when histological changes were considered in toto (i.e., any histological abnormality in the three tissues examined), using minimal or mild criteria for scoring. When minimal or mild histological changes were considered significant for a specific tissue, a 60% level of accuracy in identifying immunotoxic chemicals was obtained as compared to a 90% accuracy level that was achieved with this data set using the antibody plaque forming cell response, considered to represent the most predictive functional test. A minimal classification was obtained in the analyses of the negative control groups, suggesting that use of the minimal classification for hazard identification is inappropriate as it will likely result in a high incidence of false positives. This was not the case when mild classifications were used as an indicator of significance, which in most instances allowed the successful identification of negatives. When moderate to marked histopathological changes were used to identify immunotoxic chemicals, the level of accuracy that could be achieved was poor. A considerably higher level of accuracy was obtained for the positive control data set than the test chemical data set suggesting that the ability to detect an immunotoxic agent histologically is proportional to the potency of the immunotoxic agent. Comparison of immune function test results and histopathological results obtained from the high-dose treatment groups and the lower-dose treatment group did not reveal any significant differences between the two endpoints to predict immunotoxicity as a function of dose. Of the three lymphoid organs examined, (i.e., lymph node, thymus, and spleen), the most consistent and discernible histological lesions were observed in the thymus cortical region. These lesions correlated with thymus: body weight ratios and to a slightly lesser extent, the antibody plaque forming cell response. Addition of general toxicological endpoints such as body weight and leukocyte counts did not significantly improve the sensitivity of extended histopathology for this data set. Taken together, these data suggest that, while not as sensitive as functional analyses, extended histopathology may provide a reasonable level of accuracy as a screening test to identify immunotoxic chemicals, provided the level of stringency used to score histological lesions is carefully considered to allow for detection of immunotoxic agents while limiting false positives.
在国家毒理学计划(NTP)的支持下,评估了扩展组织病理学在检测雌性B6C3F1小鼠免疫毒性化学物质方面的准确性。成立了一个由四名病理学家组成的工作组,他们对从NTP毒理学研究的一个子集中获得的淋巴组织进行了扩展组织病理学评估,在该子集中之前进行了详细的免疫毒性评估。此外,还包括一组由三种已知免疫抑制剂组成的阳性对照数据集、一组阴性对照数据集以及一个仅由赋形剂处理组组成的额外阴性对照组。将扩展组织病理学评估获得的数据与先前进行的免疫毒性评估中更传统的免疫测试结果(包括功能性和非功能性)进行比较。数据分析表明,随着用于确定显著组织病理学变化的严格程度增加,使用组织学终点识别免疫毒性化学物质的能力呈线性下降。当将组织学变化作为一个整体考虑(即在所检查的三个组织中的任何组织学异常),使用最小或轻度评分标准时,可达到相对较高(80%)的准确率。当将最小或轻度组织学变化视为特定组织的显著变化时,与使用抗体空斑形成细胞反应(被认为是最具预测性的功能测试)对该数据集所达到的90%准确率相比,识别免疫毒性化学物质的准确率为60%。在阴性对照组的分析中得到的分类最少,这表明将最小分类用于危害识别是不合适的,因为这可能会导致高比例的假阳性。当将轻度分类用作显著性指标时情况并非如此,在大多数情况下,这允许成功识别阴性。当使用中度至明显的组织病理学变化来识别免疫毒性化学物质时,所能达到的准确率较低。阳性对照数据集的准确率明显高于测试化学物质数据集,这表明从组织学上检测免疫毒性剂的能力与免疫毒性剂的效力成正比。对高剂量治疗组和低剂量治疗组获得的免疫功能测试结果和组织病理学结果进行比较,未发现这两个终点在预测免疫毒性随剂量变化方面有任何显著差异。在所检查的三个淋巴器官(即淋巴结、胸腺和脾脏)中,在胸腺皮质区域观察到最一致和可辨别的组织学病变。这些病变与胸腺:体重比相关,在一定程度上也与抗体空斑形成细胞反应相关。添加体重和白细胞计数等一般毒理学终点并未显著提高该数据集扩展组织病理学的敏感性。综上所述,这些数据表明,虽然扩展组织病理学不如功能分析敏感,但它可以作为一种筛选测试,提供合理水平的准确性来识别免疫毒性化学物质,前提是仔细考虑用于对组织学病变评分的严格程度,以便在限制假阳性的同时检测免疫毒性剂。