Pesola Gene R, Xu Feng, Ahsan Habibul, Sternfels Pamela, Meyer Ilan H, Ford Jean G
Harlem Lung Center and Hospital Emergency Department, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Sep;11(9):944-50. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.03.020.
To determine predictors of asthma morbidity in African American patients with asthma. Proxies for asthma morbidity were emergency department (ED) visits for asthma and hospitalizations for asthma.
This was a prospective observational study that evaluated baseline predictors of asthma morbidity in adults in an urban, predominantly African American community in New York City. Potential predictors of asthma morbidity evaluated were education, gender, employment status, current smoking status, asthma severity, duration of asthma, daily use of a peak flow meter, presence or absence of pets at home, presence or absence of a significant other, presence or absence of medical insurance, and previous hospitalization for asthma in the past year. Follow-up consisted of a repeat questionnaire obtained between nine and 15 months after the baseline questionnaire. Follow-up data collection was limited to the last three-month history of ED visits or hospitalizations before the follow-up visit. At follow-up, the baseline predictors were related to the presence or absence of ED visits for asthma or hospitalizations for asthma. All predictors were evaluated individually (crude odds ratio [OR]) and simultaneously (adjusted OR) in a logistic regression model with the dichotomous outcome variable ED visits or hospitalization.
Return ED visits on follow-up were more likely to occur in asthma patients hospitalized in the previous year (adjusted OR, 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7 to 9.0) and were less likely to occur in asthma patients with pets (OR, 0.4; 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.9). Patients with moderate/severe asthma, relative to patients with mild asthma, were more likely to be seen in the ED on follow-up on initial analysis (crude OR, 2.4; 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.5), but the adjusted OR was not significant. Follow-up hospitalizations were significantly more likely to occur only in subjects reporting daily use of a peak flow meter (OR, 6.8; 95% CI = 1.3 to 34.5). Subjects hospitalized for asthma in the previous year were more likely to be hospitalized subsequently on initial analysis (crude OR, 2.9; 95% CI = 1.0 to 8.1), but the adjusted OR was not significant.
It appears that African American patients with asthma who had previous hospitalizations for asthma within the past year or use a peak flow meter daily (a marker for more severe asthma) are more likely to visit the ED in the future or to be hospitalized for asthma, respectively. These patients need to be targeted and treated more aggressively to improve asthma care and decrease morbidity. The apparent protective effect of the presence of pets on reducing ED visits is unclear at this time, and the findings need to be replicated and evaluated further.
确定非裔美国哮喘患者哮喘发病的预测因素。哮喘发病的替代指标为因哮喘到急诊科就诊及因哮喘住院。
这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,评估纽约市一个以非裔美国人为主的城市社区中成年人哮喘发病的基线预测因素。评估的哮喘发病潜在预测因素包括教育程度、性别、就业状况、当前吸烟状况、哮喘严重程度、哮喘病程、每日使用峰值流量计情况、家中是否有宠物、是否有重要他人、是否有医疗保险以及过去一年是否曾因哮喘住院。随访包括在基线问卷后9至15个月获得的重复问卷。随访数据收集限于随访就诊前最后三个月的急诊科就诊或住院病史。在随访时,将基线预测因素与是否因哮喘到急诊科就诊或因哮喘住院相关联。在二元结局变量为急诊科就诊或住院的逻辑回归模型中,对所有预测因素进行单独评估(粗比值比[OR])和同时评估(调整后OR)。
随访时再次到急诊科就诊更可能发生在去年住院的哮喘患者中(调整后OR,3.9;95%置信区间[CI]=1.7至9.0),而在有宠物的哮喘患者中发生的可能性较小(OR,0.4;95%CI=0.2至0.9)。在初步分析中,中度/重度哮喘患者相对于轻度哮喘患者在随访时更可能到急诊科就诊(粗OR,2.4;95%CI=1.1至1.5),但调整后OR无统计学意义。随访住院仅在报告每日使用峰值流量计的受试者中显著更可能发生(OR,6.8;95%CI=1.3至34.5)。在初步分析中,去年因哮喘住院的受试者随后更可能住院(粗OR,2.9;95%CI=1.0至8.1),但调整后OR无统计学意义。
似乎在过去一年曾因哮喘住院或每日使用峰值流量计(更严重哮喘的一个标志)的非裔美国哮喘患者,未来分别更可能到急诊科就诊或因哮喘住院。需要针对这些患者进行更积极的治疗,以改善哮喘护理并降低发病率。目前尚不清楚家中有宠物对减少急诊科就诊的明显保护作用,研究结果需要进一步重复和评估。