Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Larsen R, Bauer C, Wilhelm W
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Saarland, Homburg /Saar, Germany.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Oct;48(9):1168-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00498.x.
Autoregressive modelling with exogenous input of the middle-latency auditory evoked potential has been developed for monitoring of anaesthetic depth. This study was designed to investigate the dose-response relationship between endtidal desflurane concentrations and the Alaris Autoregressive Index (AAI, Alaris Medical, Hampshire, UK, version 1.4) or the bispectral index (Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA, version XP).
Twenty-one patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy were investigated. After premedication and induction of anaesthesia with propofol und remifentanil all patients received atracurium and a remifentanil background infusion at a constant rate of 0.1 micro g kg(-1) min(-1). During dissection of the prostate, desflurane endtidal concentrations were varied between 3 and 9 vol%. Both AAI and BIS were determined and compared with the respective endtidal desflurane concentration.
None of the patients showed a significant change of AAI values while changing the desflurane concentrations between 3 and 9 vol%. The dose-response of BIS values and desflurane concentrations was not uniform: two patients showed increasing BIS values with increasing desflurane concentrations, while in three patients BIS values remained unchanged. In 16 patients decreasing BIS values adequately reflected an increase in desflurane concentrations.
Changes of desflurane concentrations during deep anaesthesia were adequately displayed only in 16 of 21 cases by BIS but in none of the cases by AAI monitoring.
已开发出具有外源性输入的中潜伏期听觉诱发电位自回归模型用于麻醉深度监测。本研究旨在调查呼气末地氟烷浓度与阿拉瑞斯自回归指数(AAI,阿拉瑞斯医疗公司,英国汉普郡,版本1.4)或脑电双频指数(Aspect医疗系统公司,美国马萨诸塞州牛顿市,版本XP)之间的剂量-反应关系。
对21例计划行根治性前列腺切除术的患者进行研究。所有患者在使用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼进行术前用药和麻醉诱导后,均接受阿曲库铵和以0.1μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹的恒定速率输注的瑞芬太尼背景剂量。在前列腺切除术过程中,呼气末地氟烷浓度在3%至9%(体积分数)之间变化。分别测定AAI和BIS,并将其与相应的呼气末地氟烷浓度进行比较。
在呼气末地氟烷浓度在3%至9%(体积分数)之间变化时,没有患者的AAI值出现显著变化。BIS值与地氟烷浓度之间的剂量反应并不一致:2例患者的BIS值随地氟烷浓度升高而升高,而3例患者的BIS值保持不变。在16例患者中,BIS值降低充分反映了地氟烷浓度的升高。
在21例患者中,仅16例在深度麻醉期间地氟烷浓度的变化可通过BIS得到充分显示,但通过AAI监测则无一例能充分显示。