Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死患者中,小剂量溶栓联合糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体阻滞剂与单纯溶栓相比的心肌挽救情况。

Myocardial salvage after reduced-dose thrombolysis combined with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade versus thrombolysis alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Ndrepepa Gjin, Mehilli Julinda, Schwaiger Markus, Nekolla Stephan, Schmitt Claus, Dirschinger Josef, Schömig Albert, Kastrati Adnan

机构信息

The Deutsches Herzzentrum, 80636 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004 Jun;17(3):191-7. doi: 10.1023/B:THRO.0000040488.26414.9e.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of study was to examine the efficacy of reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab versus alteplase alone by quantifying the amount of myocardium salvaged using myocardial scintigraphy.

METHODS

This study analyzed 150 patients with acute myocardial infarction who received alteplase (69 patients) or reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab (81 patients) in the setting of the Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (STOPAMI) 1 and 2 trials. Salvage index (proportion of initial perfusion defect salvaged by reperfusion therapy), which was obtained by paired scintigraphic studies performed 7-14 days apart, was the primary endpoint of the study. One-year clinical follow-up was also done.

RESULTS

Salvage index did not differ significantly among patients treated with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab (median, 0.41 [25th; 75th percentiles: 0.13; 0.58]) compared to patients who received alteplase (0.26 [0.09; 0.61], p = 0.30). Final infarct size was 16.0% [4.0; 31.0] of the left ventricle in the group with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab and 19.4% [7.9; 34.2] of left ventricle in the group with alteplase (p = 0.44). Within a time-to-admission interval of <2 hours, there was a trend for higher values of salvage index in patients who received reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab compared with patients who received alteplase (0.55 [0.35; 0.73] versus 0.29 [0.11; 0.69], p = 0.15). For time-to-admission intervals > or = 2 hours, no such trend was observed between those who received reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab or alteplase (0.25 [0.08; 0.48] versus 0.22 [0.08; 0.46], p = 0.79). Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients (5.0%) in the group with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab versus 2 patients (3.0%) in the group with alteplase alone (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

When used as a general strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction, adding abciximab to alteplase does not increase significantly the amount of salvaged myocardium as compared with alteplase alone. Combination therapy may offer advantages over thrombolytic agents alone if such therapy is applied within 2 hours from symptom onset; however these data need to be proven by studies of adequate power.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是通过心肌闪烁显像定量分析挽救心肌的量,比较小剂量阿替普酶联合阿昔单抗与单用阿替普酶的疗效。

方法

本研究分析了150例急性心肌梗死患者,这些患者在急性心肌梗死患者闭塞冠状动脉的支架与溶栓治疗(STOPAMI)1和2试验中接受了阿替普酶治疗(69例患者)或小剂量阿替普酶联合阿昔单抗治疗(81例患者)。通过间隔7 - 14天进行的配对闪烁显像研究获得的挽救指数(再灌注治疗挽救的初始灌注缺损比例)是本研究的主要终点。还进行了为期一年的临床随访。

结果

与接受阿替普酶治疗的患者相比,接受小剂量阿替普酶联合阿昔单抗治疗的患者的挽救指数无显著差异(中位数为0.41 [第25;75百分位数:0.13;0.58]),接受阿替普酶治疗的患者为0.26 [0.09;0.61],p = 0.30)。小剂量阿替普酶联合阿昔单抗组的最终梗死面积为左心室的16.0% [4.0;31.0],阿替普酶组为左心室的19.4% [7.9;34.2](p = 0.44)。在入院时间间隔<2小时内,接受小剂量阿替普酶联合阿昔单抗治疗的患者的挽救指数有高于接受阿替普酶治疗患者的趋势(0.55 [0.35;0.73] 对 0.29 [0.11;0.69],p = 0.15)。对于入院时间间隔≥2小时,接受小剂量阿替普酶联合阿昔单抗或阿替普酶治疗的患者之间未观察到这种趋势(0.25 [0.08;0.48] 对 0.22 [0.08;0.46],p = 0.79)。小剂量阿替普酶联合阿昔单抗组有4例患者(5.0%)发生大出血,而单用阿替普酶组有2例患者(3.0%)发生大出血(p = 0.58)。

结论

在急性心肌梗死患者中作为一般策略使用时,与单用阿替普酶相比,阿替普酶联合阿昔单抗并不能显著增加挽救心肌的量。如果在症状发作后2小时内应用这种联合治疗,可能比单独使用溶栓药物有优势;然而,这些数据需要通过足够样本量的研究来证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验