Kemp Zoe, Thirlwell Cristina, Sieber Oliver, Silver Andrew, Tomlinson Ian
Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, London, UK.
Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Oct 1;13 Spec No 2:R177-85. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh247.
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) remains a frequent cause of cancer-associated mortality in the UK and still has a relatively poor outcome. Single gene defects account for up to 2-6% of cases, but twin studies suggest a hereditary component in 35%. CRC represents a paradigm for cancer genetics. Almost all the major-gene influences on CRC have been identified, and the identification of the remaining susceptibility alleles is proving troublesome. Only a few low-penetrance alleles, such as methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, appear convincingly to be associated with CRC risk. To identify the remaining CRC genes, parallel approaches, including strategies based on linkage and association and complementary analyses such as searches for modifier genes, must be employed. To gain sufficient evidence to prove that a gene is involved in CRC predisposition, it is probably necessary for multiple, adequately-powered studies to demonstrate an association with the disease, especially if the allelic variants have only a small differential effect on risk. It may also be possible to show how genes interact with each other and the environment, although this will be even more difficult. Accurate quantitation of the allele-specific risks in different populations will be necessary, but problematic, especially if those risks combine in a fashion which is not of a straightforward additive or multiplicative type. Without any good prior evidence of the nature of the remaining genetic influence on CRC, the possibility remains that this is a truly polygenic trait or that multiple, rare variants contribute to the increased risk; in these cases, identification of the genes involved will be very difficult. Despite these potential problems, the effectiveness of preventive measures for CRC, especially in high-risk individuals, means that the search for new predisposition genes is justified.
在英国,结直肠癌(CRC)仍是癌症相关死亡的常见原因,其预后相对较差。单基因缺陷占病例的2%至6%,但双胞胎研究表明35%的病例存在遗传因素。CRC是癌症遗传学的一个范例。几乎所有影响CRC的主要基因都已被识别,而识别其余的易感等位基因却颇具难度。只有少数低 penetrance 等位基因,如亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶C677T,似乎令人信服地与CRC风险相关。为了识别其余的CRC基因,必须采用并行方法,包括基于连锁和关联的策略以及互补分析,如寻找修饰基因。为了获得足够的证据证明一个基因与CRC易感性有关,可能需要多个有足够效力的研究来证明其与疾病的关联,特别是如果等位基因变体对风险的差异影响很小。也有可能展示基因之间以及基因与环境之间是如何相互作用的,尽管这将更加困难。准确量化不同人群中等位基因特异性风险是必要的,但存在问题,特别是如果这些风险以非直接相加或相乘的方式组合。如果没有关于其余遗传因素对CRC影响性质的良好先前证据,那么仍有可能这是一个真正的多基因性状,或者多个罕见变体导致风险增加;在这些情况下,识别相关基因将非常困难。尽管存在这些潜在问题,但CRC预防措施的有效性,特别是在高危个体中,意味着寻找新的易感基因是合理的。