Otero Paula, Pedernera Federico, Montenegro Sergio, Borbolla Damian, Garcia Marti Sebastián, Luna Daniel, de Quiros Fernan Gonzalez Bernaldo
Department of Medical Informatics, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):301-5.
Medical informatics became a medical specialty during the last years and this is evidenced by a great amount of journal articles regarding the subject published worldwide. We compared the presentation of Medical Informatics in two different bibliographic databases: MEDLINE and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature on the Health Sciences). Previous studies described how Medical Informatics was represented in MEDLINE, but we wanted to compare it to a regional database as LILACS. We search both databases completely (MEDLINE 1966 -2002 and LILACS 1982-2002) using the keyword "Medical Informatics" as MeSH term in MEDLINE and as DeCS term in LILACS, and we added "medical informatics" as text word and analyzed the references obtained as results. We found that MEDLINE properly represents the impact of Medical Informatics in non-Latin-American international journals, but lacks of a considerable amount of articles from this region, while LILACS, although in comparison it is smaller in size, has more articles regarding the subject. So we think that LILACS properly represents the specialty in Latin America and the Caribbean Region.
在过去几年中,医学信息学成为了一门医学专业,这一点从全球发表的大量关于该主题的期刊文章中得到了证明。我们比较了医学信息学在两个不同文献数据库中的呈现情况:MEDLINE和LILACS(拉丁美洲和加勒比地区健康科学文献数据库)。先前的研究描述了医学信息学在MEDLINE中的呈现方式,但我们想将其与像LILACS这样的区域数据库进行比较。我们使用关键词“医学信息学”在MEDLINE中作为医学主题词(MeSH)、在LILACS中作为医学主题词表(DeCS)对两个数据库进行了全面检索(MEDLINE检索时间为1966 - 2002年,LILACS检索时间为1982 - 2002年),并将“医学信息学”作为文本词添加进去,然后分析检索得到的参考文献结果。我们发现,MEDLINE恰当地体现了医学信息学在非拉丁美洲国际期刊中的影响力,但缺少该地区的大量文章,而LILACS虽然规模相对较小,但关于该主题的文章更多。所以我们认为LILACS恰当地体现了拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的这一专业情况。