Aarts Jos, Berg Marc
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):999-1002.
We compared the implementation of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in two Dutch hospitals, one being an academic medical center and the other a large regional non-academic hospital. Both implemented the TDS7000 system that was running on the same computer, located in the computing department of the academic medical center. The outcomes of the implementation were different. The introduction of CPOE in the university medical center failed, while it was a success in the non-academic hospital. An appraisal of the different outcomes is possible when we consider the implementation of information as a thorough social process in which the technical and the social are closely interrelated. Our findings suggest that organizational change associated with CPOE implementation should not focus on individual physician behavior but on medical work as a collaborative professional effort
我们比较了荷兰两家医院实施计算机化医生医嘱录入(CPOE)的情况,一家是学术医疗中心,另一家是大型地区非学术医院。两家医院都实施了运行在同一台计算机上的TDS7000系统,该计算机位于学术医疗中心的计算部门。实施的结果不同。大学医疗中心引入CPOE失败了,而在非学术医院则取得了成功。当我们将信息的实施视为一个技术与社会紧密相关的全面社会过程时,就可以对不同的结果进行评估。我们的研究结果表明,与CPOE实施相关的组织变革不应关注个别医生的行为,而应关注作为协作专业努力的医疗工作。