Suppr超能文献

[先前使用氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗后采用双侧胸廓内动脉进行紧急或急诊冠状动脉血运重建]

[Urgent or emergent coronary revascularization using bilateral internal thoracic artery after previous clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy].

作者信息

Schmidtler F, Gansera B, Spiliopoulos K, Angelis I, Neumaier-Prauser P, Kemkes B M

机构信息

Krankenhaus München-Bogenhausen, Abteilung für Kardiovaskularchirurgie, Englschalkingerstr. 77, 81925 München, Germany.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 2004 Sep;93(9):679-85. doi: 10.1007/s00392-004-0115-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Application of clopidogrel before diagnostic or therapeutical percutaneous coronary interventions has become standard for stent-thrombosis prevention. The irreversible platelet inhibition causes increasing bleeding complications if urgent coronary artery bypass grafting becomes necessary. This study evaluates the effect on bleeding complications of clopidogrel in urgent CABG using bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) and saphenous veins in all patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 166 patients (operated between 1/00-12/02) with urgent or emergency CABG, using both ITAs and compared 83 patients with previous (within 5 days) clopidogrel and aspirin application to 83 patients without clopidogrel. We evaluated chest tube output, reexploration rate and necessity of blood products, ventilation time and ICU stay.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable with age, gender, number of performed anastomoses (mean 4/ patient). Chest tube output (24 h) was higher in the clopidogrel group (935 +/- 599 ml vs 754 +/- 335 ml (p = 0.018)), as well as reexploration rate with 7.2% (6 of 83) vs 0% (0 of 83) (p < 0.001). Number of blood products in the clopidogrel group for red cells was 2.41 +/- 1.88 U vs 1.84 +/- 1.47 U p = 0.03, for plateletes 0.43 +/- 0.88 U vs 0.024 +/- 0.22 p = 0.0001, for fresh frozen plasma 0.41 +/- 1.14 U vs 0.096 +/- 0.59 U p = 0.029. Mechanical ventilation time was 11.35 +/- 8.77 h vs 10.57 +/- 9.12 h p = 0.51, ICU stay 32.1 +/- 21.8 h vs. 29.8 +/- 21.1 h (p = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous application of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin before urgent CABG induces increased chest tube output, reexploration rate and necessity of blood products, especially of plateletes. Nevertheless, routine use of both ITAs in patients after clopidogrel exposure can be performed with acceptable bleeding complications.

摘要

背景

在诊断性或治疗性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前应用氯吡格雷已成为预防支架血栓形成的标准方法。如果有必要进行紧急冠状动脉搭桥术,这种不可逆的血小板抑制会导致出血并发症增加。本研究评估了在所有患者中使用双侧胸廓内动脉(ITA)和大隐静脉进行紧急冠状动脉搭桥术时氯吡格雷对出血并发症的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了166例(2000年1月至2002年12月期间接受手术)进行紧急或急诊冠状动脉搭桥术且均使用双侧胸廓内动脉的患者,并将83例在术前(5天内)应用过氯吡格雷和阿司匹林的患者与83例未使用氯吡格雷的患者进行比较。我们评估了胸管引流量、再次手术率以及血液制品的使用必要性、通气时间和重症监护病房停留时间。

结果

两组在年龄、性别、吻合口数量(平均每位患者4个)方面具有可比性。氯吡格雷组的胸管引流量(24小时)更高(935±599毫升对754±335毫升,p = 0.018),再次手术率分别为7.2%(83例中的6例)对0%(83例中的0例,p < 0.001)。氯吡格雷组红细胞制品的使用量为2.41±1.88单位对1.84±1.47单位,p = 0.03;血小板制品为0.43±0.88单位对0.024±0.22单位,p = 0.0001;新鲜冰冻血浆为0.41±1.14单位对0.096±0.59单位,p = 0.029。机械通气时间为11.35±8.77小时对10.57±9.12小时,p = 0.51;重症监护病房停留时间为32.1±21.8小时对29.8±21.1小时(p = 0.48)。

结论

在紧急冠状动脉搭桥术之前应用氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林会导致胸管引流量增加、再次手术率升高以及血液制品尤其是血小板制品的使用必要性增加。然而,在氯吡格雷暴露后的患者中常规使用双侧胸廓内动脉,出血并发症仍在可接受范围内。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验