Pettigrew Thomas F
Department of Psychology, Social Science II, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Am Psychol. 2004 Sep;59(6):521-9. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.6.521.
The road to Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was a slow and circuitous climb, whereas the retreat down from Brown has been swift and direct. This article reviews 4 distinct U.S. Supreme Court eras of racial decisions: the segregation, preparatory, desegregation, and resegregation eras. It notes both the strengths and weaknesses of Brown and discusses the effects of school desegregation. Did racial diversity improve the life chances of African American children as intended? The results of longitudinal research demonstrate that the effects have been positive, although these results are not widely known by the American public. The article challenges this and other misconceptions about school desegregation that have become entrenched in the public's thinking and addresses ways to rekindle the spirit of Brown.
通往布朗诉托皮卡教育局案(1954年)的道路漫长而曲折,而从布朗案倒退的过程却迅速而直接。本文回顾了美国最高法院关于种族问题裁决的4个不同时代:种族隔离时代、准备时代、废除种族隔离时代和重新种族隔离时代。它指出了布朗案的优点和缺点,并讨论了学校废除种族隔离的影响。种族多样性是否如预期那样改善了非裔美国儿童的生活机会?纵向研究结果表明,其影响是积极的,尽管美国公众并不广泛了解这些结果。本文对这种以及其他一些已在公众思维中根深蒂固的关于学校废除种族隔离的误解提出了质疑,并探讨了重新激发布朗案精神的方法。