Roth Emily J, Barreto Patricia, Sherritt Lon, Palfrey Judith S, Risko Wanessa, Knight John R
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ambul Pediatr. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):418-23. doi: 10.1367/A04-010R1.1.
To design, implement, and evaluate an experiential child advocacy curriculum for pediatric residents.
Pilot study including before-after 2-group trial of an educational intervention and a qualitative component.
A large, hospital-based, urban resident continuity clinic.
General pediatrics residents (N = 29 [PGY: 1-4]).
Residents and faculty designed a longitudinal curriculum in child advocacy for the continuity clinic, which included community-based and legislative experiences for individual residents as well as clinic-based group activities. Residents reported their experiences to their clinic group at weekly preclinic conferences. In addition, residents presented posters at their year-end residency retreat and wrote grants to fund community projects based on their original findings.
We used a quantitative assessment of child advocacy knowledge, attitudes, skills, and self-reported practices, which residents completed pre- and postintervention (2 clinics) or, for comparison residents, at the beginning and end of the academic year (3 clinics). In addition, we conducted focus-group discussions with residents in the 2 intervention groups to explore unanticipated responses to the new curriculum.
Residents who received the intervention (n = 13) had a greater increase in advocacy knowledge (2.62 vs 0.19, P =.005), ability to identify community resources (0.62 vs 0.16, P =.03), self-reported advocacy skills (2.0 vs -0.21, P =.002), and perceived value of advocacy training (0.31 vs -0.19, P =.03) compared with residents who did not (n = 16). In focus groups, intervention residents (n = 17) reported being surprised by community groups' and legislators' responsiveness to resident inquiries, and they expressed enhanced confidence in engaging these groups in dialogue about child policy issues.
A longitudinal continuity clinic-based curriculum in child advocacy had significant positive impact on pediatric residents.
为儿科住院医师设计、实施并评估一门儿童权益倡导体验课程。
试点研究,包括教育干预的前后两组试验以及一个定性部分。
一家大型的、以医院为基础的城市住院医师连续性诊所。
普通儿科住院医师(N = 29[住院医师培训年:1 - 4年])。
住院医师和教员为连续性诊所设计了一门关于儿童权益倡导的纵向课程,其中包括针对个体住院医师的社区和立法体验以及基于诊所的小组活动。住院医师在每周的门诊前会议上向他们的诊所小组汇报他们的经历。此外,住院医师在年终住院医师务虚会上展示海报,并根据他们的原始发现撰写资助社区项目的拨款申请。
我们对儿童权益倡导知识、态度、技能和自我报告的实践进行了定量评估,住院医师在干预前后(2个诊所)完成评估,或者对于对照住院医师,在学年开始和结束时(3个诊所)完成评估。此外,我们与2个干预组的住院医师进行了焦点小组讨论,以探讨对新课程的意外反应。
接受干预的住院医师(n = 13)在权益倡导知识(2.62对0.19,P = 0.005)、识别社区资源的能力(0.62对0.16,P = 0.03)、自我报告的权益倡导技能(2.0对 - 0.21,P = 0.002)以及权益倡导培训的感知价值(0.31对 - 0.19,P = 0.03)方面的提升幅度均大于未接受干预的住院医师(n = 16)。在焦点小组中,干预组住院医师(n = 17)报告称,社区团体和立法者对住院医师询问的回应让他们感到惊讶,并且他们表示在就儿童政策问题与这些团体进行对话时更有信心。
一门基于连续性诊所的儿童权益倡导纵向课程对儿科住院医师有显著的积极影响。