Freeman Adele, Malone John, Hunt Glenn E
Aftercare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;38(10):811-8. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01466.x.
The primary aim of this study was to describe high support accommodation services available for patients with chronic mental illness living in New South Wales (NSW). The second aim was to ask patients in these facilities about their needs and satisfaction with services and to assess their level of functioning.
Non-inpatient services matching NSW Health's definition for high support, very high support and residential rehabilitation were sent a survey regarding type of service, criteria for acceptance, choice of housing options, patient demographics, evaluation methods and staff details. The Camberwell Assessment of Need was used to assess needs and the Life Skills Profile-16 was used to assess level of functioning. Comparisons were made between services operated by NSW Health and non-government organizations (NGOs), rural and urban services and services providing 24-hour support and those with less intensive staffing.
Forty of the 42 identified services were included in the survey (95% response rate) of which 25 were operated by NGOs. There were 753 residential beds and 1132 patients lived in these facilities over the financial year 2001/2002. Interviews were completed at 25 locations across the state with 159 patients. Seventy-four percent were male and the mean age was 43 years. Patients had on average 7.6 needs of which 2.2 were unmet and their mean LSP-16 total score was 16.8. Almost half the patients responded that they were homeless at one time because they could not find appropriate housing.
There were no significant differences in the number of needs expressed by patients residing in government or non-government operated services, those living in rural or urban areas and those in 24-hour services compared to patients in less intensively staffed services. Existing services are doing a good job of meeting patients' needs for practical assistance, but social and psychological needs remain unmet for a significant proportion.
本研究的主要目的是描述新南威尔士州(NSW)为患有慢性精神疾病的患者提供的高支持性住宿服务。第二个目的是询问这些机构中的患者对服务的需求和满意度,并评估他们的功能水平。
向符合新南威尔士州卫生部对高支持、极高支持和住院康复定义的非住院服务机构发送了一份关于服务类型、接纳标准、住房选择、患者人口统计学、评估方法和工作人员详细信息的调查问卷。使用坎伯韦尔需求评估来评估需求,使用生活技能概况-16来评估功能水平。对新南威尔士州卫生部运营的服务机构和非政府组织(NGO)运营的服务机构、农村和城市服务机构以及提供24小时支持的服务机构和人员配备较少的服务机构进行了比较。
在确定的42项服务中,有40项被纳入调查(回复率为95%),其中25项由非政府组织运营。在2001/2002财政年度,这些机构有753张住宿床位,1132名患者居住在这些设施中。在全州25个地点对159名患者进行了访谈。74%为男性,平均年龄为43岁。患者平均有7.6项需求,其中2.2项未得到满足,他们的生活技能概况-16总分平均为16.8。近一半的患者表示他们曾一度无家可归,因为他们找不到合适的住房。
与人员配备较少的服务机构中的患者相比,居住在政府或非政府运营的服务机构中的患者、居住在农村或城市地区的患者以及接受24小时服务的患者所表达的需求数量没有显著差异。现有服务在满足患者对实际援助的需求方面做得很好,但很大一部分患者的社会和心理需求仍未得到满足。