Carding P N, Steen I N, Webb A, MacKenzie K, Deary I J, Wilson J A
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Newcastle, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Oct;29(5):538-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00846.x.
This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and sensitivity to change of three commonly used acoustic parameters as measured by the Multi-Dimensional Voice Programme (MDVP); jitter, shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio. A total of 231 subjects' voices were recorded and analysed. The sample comprised 145 dysphonic patients who received intervention (surgery or voice therapy), 36 dysphonic patients who received no intervention, and 50 non-dysphonic (normal) subjects. All voices were recorded and analysed on two occasions (before and after treatment, or test-retest assessment) using a standard procedure. These data were analysed using standard psychometric procedures for assessing reliability and responsiveness. The acoustic analysis measures demonstrated poor to moderate reliability and effect size with respect to their sensitivity to change. Caution should be exercised in the injudicious use of computer-based acoustic analysis systems as an isolated measure of voice outcome in any clinical trial of interventions aimed at improving voice quality.
本研究旨在评估通过多维度嗓音程序(MDVP)测量的三个常用声学参数(抖动、闪烁和噪声谐波比)的可靠性和对变化的敏感性。总共记录并分析了231名受试者的声音。样本包括145名接受干预(手术或嗓音治疗)的发声障碍患者、36名未接受干预的发声障碍患者和50名无发声障碍(正常)受试者。所有声音均使用标准程序在两个时间点(治疗前后或重测评估)进行记录和分析。这些数据使用标准心理测量程序进行分析,以评估可靠性和反应性。声学分析测量在对变化的敏感性方面显示出从差到中等的可靠性和效应大小。在任何旨在改善嗓音质量的干预临床试验中,若不加判断地将基于计算机的声学分析系统作为嗓音结果的单独测量方法,应谨慎使用。