McConn Donavon J, Lin Yvonne S, Allen Kyle, Kunze Kent L, Thummel Kenneth E
Department of Pharmaceutics, Box 357610, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7610, USA.
Drug Metab Dispos. 2004 Oct;32(10):1083-91. doi: 10.1124/dmd.32.10..
The objectives of this study were to characterize and compare the reversible inhibition and time-dependent inactivation of cytochromes P450 3A4 and 3A5 (CYP3A4 and CYP3A5) by erythromycin, diltiazem, and nicardipine. In the following experiments, we used cDNA-expressed CYP3A Supersomes and CYP3A-phenotyped human liver microsomes. We estimated the apparent constants for reversible inhibition (Ki(app) and IC50) and the irreversible kinetic constants (KI and kinact) for time-dependent inhibition. Based on an aggregate of Ki(app) and IC50 measurements, all inhibitors showed a greater inhibitory potency for CYP3A4 compared with CYP3A5. In addition, for each inhibitor, the kinact for CYP3A4 was approximately 4-fold higher than that for CYP3A5, indicating a greater propensity for time-dependent loss of CYP3A4 activity than of CYP3A5. Difference spectra experiments revealed an NADPH-dependent peak at approximately 455 nm [metabolite-inhibitor (MI) complex] following incubation of all three drugs with CYP3A4. There was no discernable MI complex formation following CYP3A5 incubation with any of the inhibitors. However, when CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 were incubated simultaneously with erythromycin, both enzymes appeared to contribute to the formation of a MI complex. Additional experiments revealed that erythromycin caused a comparable type I spectral change when bound to CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 (Ks=48 microM and 52 microM, respectively). Moreover, CYP3A5 exhibited only a moderately slower rate for the initial N-demethylation than did CYP3A4 (intrinsic clearance=41 versus 99 microl/min/nmol, respectively). In conclusion, erythromycin, diltiazem, and nicardipine were weaker inhibitors of CYP3A5 and inactivated the enzyme at a slower rate than their respective effects on CYP3A4. With respect to erythromycin, the failure of CYP3A5 to form a MI complex appears to be the result of slowed or impaired metabolic events downstream from the initial catalytic step, possibly due to a different orientation of the substrate molecule in the active site.
本研究的目的是表征和比较红霉素、地尔硫䓬和尼卡地平对细胞色素P450 3A4和3A5(CYP3A4和CYP3A5)的可逆抑制作用以及时间依赖性失活情况。在接下来的实验中,我们使用了cDNA表达的CYP3A超微粒体和经CYP3A表型分析的人肝微粒体。我们估算了可逆抑制的表观常数(Ki(app)和IC50)以及时间依赖性抑制的不可逆动力学常数(KI和kinact)。基于对Ki(app)和IC50测量值的汇总,与CYP3A5相比,所有抑制剂对CYP3A4均表现出更强的抑制效力。此外,对于每种抑制剂,CYP3A4的kinact比CYP3A5高约4倍,这表明CYP3A4活性随时间依赖性丧失的倾向比CYP3A5更大。差异光谱实验显示,将所有三种药物与CYP3A4孵育后,在约455 nm处出现一个依赖于NADPH的峰[代谢物 - 抑制剂(MI)复合物]。用任何一种抑制剂孵育CYP3A5后,均未观察到明显的MI复合物形成。然而,当CYP3A4和CYP3A5与红霉素同时孵育时,两种酶似乎都对MI复合物的形成有贡献。额外的实验表明,红霉素与CYP3A5和CYP3A4结合时会引起类似的I型光谱变化(Ks分别为48 microM和52 microM)。此外,CYP3A5的初始N - 去甲基化速率仅比CYP3A4略慢(内在清除率分别为41和99微升/分钟/纳摩尔)。总之,红霉素、地尔硫䓬和尼卡地平对CYP3A5的抑制作用较弱,使该酶失活的速率比它们对CYP3A4的各自作用要慢。关于红霉素,CYP3A5未能形成MI复合物似乎是初始催化步骤下游代谢事件减缓或受损的结果,这可能是由于底物分子在活性位点的取向不同所致。