Suppr超能文献

影响老年护理机构合理用药实施的因素。

Factors influencing the implementation of quality use of medicines in residential aged care.

作者信息

Cheek Julianne, Gilbert Andrew, Ballantyne Alison, Penhall Robert

机构信息

Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2004;21(12):813-24. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421120-00005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In response to concerns about, and issues pertaining to, medication use practices in residential aged-care facilities (RACFs), the Australian Pharmaceutical Advisory Council (APAC) established a working party on quality use of medicines (QUM) in nursing homes and hostels. The APAC is a representative ministerial advisory forum bringing together key stakeholders from the medical, nursing and pharmacy professions, as well as pharmaceutical industry, consumer and government sectors. The working party developed the integrated best practice model for medication management in RACFs.

OBJECTIVES

This study arose from concerns that, despite the availability of such guidelines to inform best practice in RACFs, there remain barriers to its implementation. Thus, the focus of this research was to explore factors influencing the implementation of best practice with respect to QUM in RACFs.

METHODS

This multimethod, multidisciplinary study was conducted in a representative sample of 12 RACFs in one Australian state - South Australia. The methods used were Critical Incident Technique (CIT) interviews, focus groups, nominal groups and Participatory Action Research.

RESULTS

In stage one of the research the CIT interviews identified four major issues/factors influencing the implementation of best practice: contextual/structural, boundaries, day-to-day practices and keeping up. These themes were developed in the focus and nominal group sessions and the project team prepared a discussion paper summarising stage one results. In stage two participants were asked to use the discussion paper to develop a way forward. Medication Advisory Committees (MACs) emerged as a key strategy. Each participating RACF was then supported to establish and maintain a MAC. A second workshop heard feedback from the facilities on factors supporting the MACs and barriers to their functioning. Eleven of the 12 RACFs had a functioning MAC at the end of the project. Key support factors included: an external facilitator to help organise MAC meetings, provision of resources, such as terms of reference, agendas, policy statements and the sharing of information between MACs. In stage three a set of agreed recommendations was prepared and submitted to the funding body. The recommendations reported here informed the development of the peak guidelines for medication management and administration in Australia.

CONCLUSION

This project has been groundbreaking in its impact on Australian aged-care practice. A major outcome has been significantly improved communication and collaboration between industry organisations, academic disciplines, professional bodies and educators involved in the RACFs.

摘要

背景

为回应人们对老年护理机构(RACFs)用药实践相关问题的担忧,澳大利亚药物咨询委员会(APAC)成立了一个关于养老院和宿舍优质用药(QUM)的工作小组。APAC是一个具有代表性的部长级咨询论坛,汇集了医学、护理和药学专业以及制药行业、消费者和政府部门的关键利益相关者。该工作小组制定了老年护理机构用药管理的综合最佳实践模式。

目的

本研究源于人们的担忧,即尽管有此类指南可指导老年护理机构的最佳实践,但在实施过程中仍存在障碍。因此,本研究的重点是探索影响老年护理机构优质用药最佳实践实施的因素。

方法

本多方法、多学科研究在澳大利亚南澳大利亚州12家具有代表性样本的老年护理机构中进行。使用的方法包括关键事件技术(CIT)访谈、焦点小组、名义小组和参与式行动研究。

结果

在研究的第一阶段,CIT访谈确定了影响最佳实践实施的四个主要问题/因素:背景/结构、界限、日常实践和跟上步伐。这些主题在焦点小组和名义小组会议中得到进一步探讨,项目团队编写了一份讨论文件,总结了第一阶段的结果。在第二阶段,要求参与者利用讨论文件制定前进的方向。药物咨询委员会(MACs)成为一项关键策略。随后,支持每个参与的老年护理机构建立并维持一个MAC。第二次研讨会听取了各机构关于支持MACs的因素及其运作障碍的反馈。在项目结束时,12家老年护理机构中有11家拥有运作正常的MAC。关键支持因素包括:帮助组织MAC会议的外部协调人、提供资源,如职权范围、议程、政策声明以及MACs之间的信息共享。在第三阶段,制定了一套商定的建议并提交给资助机构。此处报告的建议为澳大利亚用药管理和给药的最高指南的制定提供了参考。

结论

该项目对澳大利亚老年护理实践产生了开创性的影响。一个主要成果是显著改善了参与老年护理机构的行业组织、学术学科、专业团体和教育工作者之间的沟通与合作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验