肝素与低分子量肝素:第七届抗栓与溶栓治疗ACCP会议
Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.
作者信息
Hirsh Jack, Raschke Robert
机构信息
Henderson Research Centre, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada.
出版信息
Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):188S-203S. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.188S.
This article about unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a pentasaccharide, catalyzing the inactivation of thrombin and other clotting factors. UFH also binds endothelial cells, platelet factor 4, and platelets, leading to rather unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Variability in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents necessitates site-specific validation of the aPTT therapeutic range in order to properly monitor UFH therapy. Lack of validation has been an oversight in many clinical trials comparing UFH to LMWH. In patients with apparent heparin resistance, anti-factor Xa monitoring may be superior to measurement of aPTT. LMWHs lack the nonspecific binding affinities of UFH, and, as a result, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. LMWHs have replaced UFH for most clinical indications for the following reasons: (1) these properties allow LMWHs to be administered subcutaneously, once daily without laboratory monitoring; and (2) the evidence from clinical trials that LMWH is as least as effective as and is safer than UFH. Several clinical issues regarding the use of LMWHs remain unanswered. These relate to the need for monitoring with an anti-factor Xa assay in patients with severe obesity or renal insufficiency. The therapeutic range for anti-factor Xa activity depends on the dosing interval. Anti-factor Xa monitoring is prudent when administering weight-based doses of LMWH to patients who weigh > 150 kg. It has been determined that UFH infusion is preferable to LMWH injection in patients with creatinine clearance of < 25 mL/min, until further data on therapeutic dosing of LMWHs in renal failure have been published. However, when administered in low doses prophylactically, LMWH is safe for therapy in patients with renal failure. Protamine may help to reverse bleeding related to LWMH, although anti-factor Xa activity is not fully normalized by protamine. The synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux is a promising new antithrombotic agent for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.
本文关于普通肝素(UFH)和低分子量肝素(LMWH)的内容,是第七届美国胸科医师学会抗栓与溶栓治疗会议:循证指南的一部分。普通肝素是一种糖胺聚糖的异质混合物,通过一个五糖与抗凝血酶结合,催化凝血酶和其他凝血因子的失活。普通肝素还与内皮细胞、血小板因子4和血小板结合,导致其药代动力学和药效学特性相当难以预测。活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)试剂的变异性使得有必要对aPTT治疗范围进行特定部位的验证,以便正确监测普通肝素治疗。在许多比较普通肝素与低分子量肝素的临床试验中,缺乏验证一直是一个疏忽。在明显存在肝素抵抗的患者中,抗Xa因子监测可能优于aPTT测量。低分子量肝素缺乏普通肝素的非特异性结合亲和力,因此,低分子量肝素制剂具有更可预测的药代动力学和药效学特性。低分子量肝素已取代普通肝素用于大多数临床适应证,原因如下:(1)这些特性使低分子量肝素能够皮下给药,每日一次,无需实验室监测;(2)临床试验证据表明,低分子量肝素至少与普通肝素一样有效且更安全。关于低分子量肝素使用的几个临床问题仍未得到解答。这些问题涉及对严重肥胖或肾功能不全患者进行抗Xa因子检测监测的必要性。抗Xa因子活性的治疗范围取决于给药间隔。对体重>150 kg的患者给予基于体重的低分子量肝素剂量时,进行抗Xa因子监测是谨慎的。已确定,在肌酐清除率<25 mL/min的患者中,普通肝素输注优于低分子量肝素注射,直到关于肾功能衰竭患者低分子量肝素治疗剂量的进一步数据公布。然而,当以低剂量预防性给药时,低分子量肝素对肾功能衰竭患者的治疗是安全的。鱼精蛋白可能有助于逆转与低分子量肝素相关的出血,尽管鱼精蛋白不能使抗Xa因子活性完全恢复正常。合成五糖磺达肝癸钠是一种用于预防和治疗静脉血栓栓塞的有前景的新型抗栓药物。