Suppr超能文献

血液透析患者的残余肾功能下降速度是否比腹膜透析患者更快?证据有多充分?

Does residual renal function decline more rapidly in hemodialysis than in peritoneal dialysis? How good is the evidence?

作者信息

Horinek Anthony, Misra Madhukar

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri 65212, USA.

出版信息

Adv Perit Dial. 2004;20:137-40.

Abstract

Residual renal function (RRF) is an important determinant of survival on dialysis. Preservation of RRF is also important for lowering comorbidity and improving quality of life. Initiation of dialysis is associated with gradual loss of RRF over time. As compared with hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis is reported to be associated with a slower decline of RRF. Also, RRF depends on several factors that may affect its decline independent of dialysis. The analysis of RRF decline on dialysis is therefore complex. The present article examines the issues in detail and provides evidence if one form of dialysis is superior to the other in preserving RRF.

摘要

残余肾功能(RRF)是透析患者生存的重要决定因素。保留RRF对于降低合并症和提高生活质量也很重要。开始透析后,RRF会随着时间逐渐丧失。与血液透析相比,据报道腹膜透析与RRF下降较慢有关。此外,RRF取决于几个因素,这些因素可能独立于透析而影响其下降。因此,透析时RRF下降的分析很复杂。本文详细探讨了这些问题,并提供了一种透析方式在保留RRF方面是否优于另一种透析方式的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验