Suppr超能文献

单项图形表示量表。

Single-item graphic representational scales.

作者信息

Patrician Patricia A

机构信息

U.S. Army Nurse Corps, Nursing Research Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2004 Sep-Oct;53(5):347-52. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200409000-00011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-item measures of constructs are parsimonious alternatives to multiple-item measures in many types of research. Before selecting a particular instrument, researchers must first determine whether to use a multi-item or single-item instrument to measure the concept to be evaluated. Currently, single-item measures are widely used for both pain and job satisfaction research.

OBJECTIVE

To review theoretical and empirical studies of single-item measures, with an emphasis on graphic representational (faces) scales.

METHODS

In this review, theoretical considerations, reliability, validity issues, and comparisons between single- and multiple-item measures are discussed. Faces scales are emphasized as an economical method for assessing such affective responses as pain and job satisfaction.

RESULTS

Single-item measures in general, and faces scales in particular, can be valid and reliable measures for global concepts.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of their ease of administration, lessened respondent burden, and global concept representation, single-item measures have great potential for various types of research. Nurse researchers should seriously consider single-item measures as part of their methodological research "toolkit."

摘要

背景

在许多类型的研究中,构建的单项测量是多项测量的简约替代方法。在选择特定工具之前,研究人员必须首先确定是使用多项还是单项工具来测量待评估的概念。目前,单项测量广泛应用于疼痛和工作满意度研究。

目的

回顾单项测量的理论和实证研究,重点关注图形表示(面部)量表。

方法

在本综述中,讨论了理论考量、信度、效度问题以及单项和多项测量之间的比较。面部量表被强调为评估疼痛和工作满意度等情感反应的一种经济方法。

结果

一般而言,单项测量,尤其是面部量表,可以是用于整体概念的有效且可靠的测量方法。

结论

由于其易于实施、减轻受访者负担以及对整体概念的表示,单项测量在各类研究中具有巨大潜力。护士研究人员应认真考虑将单项测量作为其方法学研究“工具包”的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验