Suppr超能文献

炭疽疫苗的安全性:对向疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS)报告的不良事件进行的扩展审查与评估

Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

作者信息

Sever John L, Brenner Alan I, Gale Arnold D, Lyle Jerry M, Moulton Lawrence H, Ward Brian J, West David J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Children's National Medical Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20010-2970, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Dec;13(12):825-40. doi: 10.1002/pds.936.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the safety of a licensed anthrax vaccine (AVA) given to more than 500,000 US military personnel, through review and medical evaluation of adverse events (AEs) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

METHODS

AEs were summarized by person, vaccine lot, type, frequency and impact. A Delphic approach was used to tentatively assess causality in an effort to detect serious AEs (SAEs) or other medically important AEs (OMIAEs) possibly attributable to AVA.

RESULTS

The Anthrax Vaccine Expert Committee (AVEC) reviewed 1841 reports describing 3991 AEs (9.4 reports/10,000 doses of AVA) that were submitted to VAERS from 1Q1998 through 4Q2001. One hundred forty-seven reports described an SAE or OMIAE, of which 26 were tentatively rated as possible, probable or certain consequences of vaccination (injection-site reaction [12], 'anaphylactic-like reaction' [5] and eight other systemic AEs [1-2 each]).

CONCLUSIONS

This review produced no evidence for an unusual rate of any SAE or OMIAE attributable to AVA. It supported an earlier impression that AVA may cause significant local inflammation and should be administered over the deltoid rather than the triceps to avoid direct or compression injury to the ulnar nerve. The subjects of VAERS reports tended to be older than all recipients of AVA. Females generally had and/or reported AEs more often than males, but transient articular reactions were surprisingly more common in males. Variations in the frequency or severity (as judged by hospitalization and/or loss of duty) of reported AEs did not suggest a significant problem with (1) a particular lot of AVA, (2) recurrent AEs after multiple doses or (3) vaccination of persons with a concomitant illness or those given other vaccines or medications.

摘要

目的

通过对向疫苗不良事件报告系统(VAERS)报告的不良事件(AE)进行审查和医学评估,评估一种已获许可的炭疽疫苗(AVA)给予50多万美国军事人员后的安全性。

方法

按人员、疫苗批次、类型、频率和影响对不良事件进行汇总。采用德尔菲法初步评估因果关系,以检测可能归因于AVA的严重不良事件(SAE)或其他具有医学重要性的不良事件(OMIAE)。

结果

炭疽疫苗专家委员会(AVEC)审查了1998年第一季度至2001年第四季度提交给VAERS的1841份报告,这些报告描述了3991起不良事件(每10000剂AVA有9.4份报告)。147份报告描述了严重不良事件或具有医学重要性的不良事件,其中26份被初步评定为接种疫苗可能、很可能或肯定的后果(注射部位反应[12例]、“类过敏反应”[5例]和其他8种全身性不良事件[每种1 - 2例])。

结论

本次审查没有证据表明归因于AVA的任何严重不良事件或具有医学重要性的不良事件发生率异常。它支持了早期的一种观点,即AVA可能会引起明显的局部炎症,并且应该在三角肌而非肱三头肌上接种以避免尺神经受到直接或压迫性损伤。VAERS报告的受试者往往比所有AVA接种者年龄更大。女性通常比男性更常出现和/或报告不良事件,但短暂的关节反应在男性中出人意料地更为常见。报告的不良事件在频率或严重程度(通过住院和/或缺勤判断)上的差异并未表明(1)某一特定批次的AVA、(2)多剂接种后的复发性不良事件或(3)患有伴发疾病的人员或接种其他疫苗或药物的人员接种疫苗存在重大问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验