Neff Bryan D, Wahl Lindi M
Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Evolution. 2004 Aug;58(8):1846-51. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00467.x.
Sperm competition is a major force of sexual selection, but its implications for mating system and life-history evolution are just beginning to be understood. Of particular importance is understanding the mechanisms of sperm competition. Models have been developed to determine if sperm competition operates in a fair raffle process, whereby each sperm from competing males has an equal chance of fertilizing a female's ova, or if it operates in a loaded raffle process, whereby one male's sperm has a fertilization advantage. These models require data on relative sperm and offspring (paternity) numbers of competing males. Here we develop a model based on maximum-likelihood methods for differentiating between the fair and loaded raffle processes. The model calculates the relative competitiveness of two males' sperm (loadings) as well as the economy of scale (nonlinear returns to sperm number). Previous models implicitly assumed that there is no economy of scale, which may not be the case when there is cooperation or interference among sperm from a given male. We demonstrate that our model has superior power-in some instances more than double-than previous models. We apply our model to an example of sperm competition in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and show that the system may be characterized by a loaded raffle attributable to effects of second male precedence.
精子竞争是性选择的一股主要力量,但其对交配系统和生活史进化的影响才刚刚开始被理解。特别重要的是了解精子竞争的机制。已开发出模型来确定精子竞争是在公平抽奖过程中进行,即竞争雄性的每个精子使雌性卵子受精的机会均等,还是在偏向抽奖过程中进行,即某一雄性的精子具有受精优势。这些模型需要有关竞争雄性的相对精子数量和后代(父权)数量的数据。在此,我们基于最大似然法开发了一个模型,用于区分公平抽奖过程和偏向抽奖过程。该模型计算两个雄性精子的相对竞争力(偏向程度)以及规模经济(精子数量的非线性回报)。先前的模型隐含地假设不存在规模经济,而当来自某一雄性的精子之间存在合作或干扰时,情况可能并非如此。我们证明,我们的模型具有更强的能力——在某些情况下比先前的模型强一倍以上。我们将我们的模型应用于孔雀鱼(Poecilia reticulata)精子竞争的一个例子,并表明该系统的特征可能是由于第二雄鱼优先权效应导致的偏向抽奖。