Wheeler Melissa, Roth Andrew G, Dsida Richard M, Rae Bronwyn, Seshadri Roopa, Sullivan Christine L, Heffner Corri L, Coté Charles J
Departments of Pediatrics and Preventive Medicine, Children's Memorial Institute of Education and Research,The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, 2300 Children's Plaza, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Anesthesiology. 2004 Oct;101(4):842-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200410000-00007.
The authors' hypothesis was that a video-assisted technique should speed resident skill acquisition for flexible fiberoptic oral tracheal intubation (FI) of pediatric patients because the attending anesthesiologist can provide targeted instruction when sharing the view of the airway as the resident attempts intubation.
Twenty Clinical Anesthesia year 2 residents, novices in pediatric FI, were randomly assigned to either the traditional group (traditional eyepiece FI) or the video group (video-assisted FI). One of two attending anesthesiologists supervised each resident during FI of 15 healthy children, aged 1-6 yr. The time from mask removal to confirmation of endotracheal tube placement by end-tidal carbon dioxide detection was recorded. Intubation attempts were limited to 3 min; up to three attempts were allowed. The primary outcome measure, time to success or failure, was compared between groups. Failure rate and number of attempts were also compared between groups.
Three hundred patient intubations were attempted; eight failed. On average, the residents in the video group were faster, were three times more likely to successfully intubate at any given time during an attempt, and required fewer attempts per patient compared to those in the traditional group.
The video system seems to be superior for teaching residents fiberoptic intubation in children.
作者的假设是,视频辅助技术应能加快住院医师对小儿患者进行可弯曲纤维光学经口气管插管(FI)的技能掌握,因为在住院医师尝试插管时,主治麻醉医师在共享气道视野的同时可提供有针对性的指导。
20名临床麻醉专业二年级住院医师(小儿FI新手)被随机分配至传统组(传统目镜FI)或视频组(视频辅助FI)。在为15名1至6岁健康儿童进行FI时,由两名主治麻醉医师中的一名监督每位住院医师。记录从移除面罩到通过呼气末二氧化碳检测确认气管导管位置的时间。插管尝试限制在3分钟;最多允许进行三次尝试。比较两组之间的主要结局指标,即成功或失败的时间。还比较了两组之间的失败率和尝试次数。
共尝试了300例患者的插管;8例失败。平均而言,与传统组相比,视频组的住院医师速度更快,在任何给定尝试时间成功插管的可能性高出三倍,且每位患者所需的尝试次数更少。
视频系统在教授住院医师小儿纤维光学插管方面似乎更具优势。