Lijtmaer Ruth M
Contemporary Center for Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, Fairleigh Dickenson University, Madison, NJ, USA.
J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2004 Fall;32(3):483-98. doi: 10.1521/jaap.32.3.483.44775.
Patients who express intense, erotic attraction to their therapists pose special treatment challenges that may not respond well to the interpretative effects of the therapist. The wish that the therapist demonstrate love for the patient and the therapists' own erotic feelings toward such patients can create misalliances as well difficult technical moments. Furthermore, some patients expressing their love for their therapist may have physiological manifestations while others would not. At the same time, therapists may not experience erotic feelings toward the patients' expressions of love. The purpose of this paper is to try to answer the following questions: How do we conceptualize our patients' erotic manifestations? Are those expressions of Oedipal or preoedipal pathology? What are the countertransference reactions of the analyst? Two clinical examples will highlight these issues.
对治疗师表现出强烈的、带有性冲动的吸引力的患者带来了特殊的治疗挑战,可能对治疗师的解释性作用反应不佳。患者希望治疗师向其表达爱意,以及治疗师自身对这类患者产生的性冲动情感,可能会造成治疗中的不当联盟以及艰难的技术时刻。此外,一些表达对治疗师爱意的患者可能会有生理表现,而另一些则不会。同时,治疗师可能不会对患者表达的爱意产生性冲动情感。本文旨在尝试回答以下问题:我们如何理解患者的性冲动表现?这些表现是俄狄浦斯期还是前俄狄浦斯期病理的体现?分析师的反移情反应是什么?两个临床案例将突出这些问题。