Wong Edward C C, Perez-Albuerne Evelio, Moscow Jeffrey A, Luban Naomi L C
Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Feb;44(2):119-27. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20159.
Little is known about the criteria used by pediatric oncologists for the transfusion of red blood cells and platelets to pediatric oncology patients.
Data regarding red blood cell and platelet transfusion practices were collected with an internet-based survey of physician members of the American Society for Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPH/O). Respondents were asked to define platelet and red blood cell transfusion thresholds in a variety of clinical scenarios, and to describe criteria for dealing with cytomegalovirus (CMV) transmission from blood products, platelet dosing strategies, and prevention of RhD alloimmunization.
The overall response rate was 31.4% (264 of 841). Of the respondents, 76% indicated that their institution had defined criteria for acceptable transfusion practice; of these respondents, 114 (57%) indicated that there were special guidelines for pediatric oncology patients. Examination of the distribution of threshold platelet counts and hemoglobin levels that would prompt transfusion indicated a wide range of transfusion practice in commonly encountered clinical scenarios. Similar variability in practice was evident in platelet dosing strategies, CMV prevention strategies, and in the use of anti-D in RhD-negative patients who received RhD-positive platelets.
This current survey demonstrates that transfusion practices vary widely among pediatric hematology/oncology specialists and that prospective clinical trials may be necessary to determine optimal criteria for blood product support in pediatric oncology patients.
关于儿科肿瘤学家给儿科肿瘤患者输注红细胞和血小板所使用的标准,人们了解甚少。
通过对美国儿科血液学/肿瘤学学会(ASPH/O)的医生会员进行基于互联网的调查,收集有关红细胞和血小板输注实践的数据。要求受访者确定在各种临床情况下的血小板和红细胞输注阈值,并描述处理血液制品中巨细胞病毒(CMV)传播的标准、血小板给药策略以及预防RhD同种免疫的方法。
总体回复率为31.4%(841人中的264人)。在受访者中,76%表示他们的机构已经确定了可接受的输血实践标准;在这些受访者中,114人(57%)表示有针对儿科肿瘤患者的特殊指南。对提示输血的血小板计数阈值和血红蛋白水平分布的检查表明,在常见的临床情况下输血实践范围广泛。在血小板给药策略、CMV预防策略以及接受RhD阳性血小板的RhD阴性患者中使用抗-D方面,实践中也存在类似的变异性。
本次调查表明,儿科血液学/肿瘤学专家之间的输血实践差异很大,可能需要进行前瞻性临床试验来确定儿科肿瘤患者血液制品支持的最佳标准。