Suppr超能文献

重组凝血因子VIIa与凝血因子VIII抑制剂旁路活性输注后的血栓形成事件发生率比较

Comparative thrombotic event incidence after infusion of recombinant factor VIIa versus factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity.

作者信息

Aledort L M

机构信息

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029-6574, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Oct;2(10):1700-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00944.x.

Abstract

Thrombosis is a rare but well-recognized potential complication of Factor VIII Inhibitor Bypass Activity (FEIBA) infusion. Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is increasingly used as an alternative to FEIBA; however, the thrombotic safety profile of rFVIIa remains incompletely characterized. To determine the incidence rates of thrombotic adverse events (AEs) after infusion of rFVIIa and FEIBA. Data from the MedWatch pharmacovigilance program of the US Food and Drug Administration, as supplemented by published case reports, were used in conjunction with estimated numbers of infusions available from manufacturers to assess comparative incidence of thrombotic AEs in patients receiving rFVIIa or FEIBA in the period from April 1999 through June 2002. Reported thrombotic AEs were rare, with incidence rates of 24.6 per 10(5) infusions (CI, 19.1-31.2 per 10(5) infusions) for rFVIIa and 8.24 per 10(5) infusions (CI, 4.71-13.4 per 10(5) infusions) for FEIBA. Thrombotic AEs were significantly more frequent in rFVIIa than FEIBA recipients (incidence rate ratio, 2.98; CI, 1.71-5.52). The most commonly documented single type of thrombotic AE after rFVIIa infusion was cerebrovascular thrombosis, while myocardial infarction was the most frequent type in patients receiving FEIBA. Contrasting AE reporting patterns between rFVIIa and FEIBA may have contributed to the observed difference in thrombotic event incidence. Nevertheless, this comprehensive pharmacovigilance assessment does not support superior thrombotic safety of rFVIIa and suggests that thrombotic AE risk may be higher in rFVIIa than FEIBA recipients.

摘要

血栓形成是凝血因子 VIII 抑制物旁路活性制剂(FEIBA)输注一种罕见但已被充分认识的潜在并发症。重组凝血因子 VIIa(rFVIIa)越来越多地被用作 FEIBA 的替代品;然而,rFVIIa 的血栓形成安全性仍未完全明确。为了确定输注 rFVIIa 和 FEIBA 后血栓形成不良事件(AE)的发生率。美国食品药品监督管理局 MedWatch 药物警戒计划的数据,辅以已发表的病例报告,并结合制造商提供的估计输注次数,用于评估 1999 年 4 月至 2002 年 6 月期间接受 rFVIIa 或 FEIBA 的患者中血栓形成 AE 的相对发生率。报告的血栓形成 AE 很少见,rFVIIa 的发生率为每 10⁵次输注 24.6 例(CI,每 10⁵次输注 19.1 - 31.2 例),FEIBA 为每 10⁵次输注 8.24 例(CI,每 10⁵次输注 4.71 - 13.4 例)。接受 rFVIIa 的患者血栓形成 AE 的发生率显著高于接受 FEIBA 的患者(发生率比值,2.98;CI,1.71 - 5.52)。rFVIIa 输注后最常见的单一类型血栓形成 AE 是脑血管血栓形成,而在接受 FEIBA 的患者中,心肌梗死是最常见的类型。rFVIIa 和 FEIBA 之间不同的 AE 报告模式可能导致了观察到的血栓形成事件发生率差异。尽管如此,这项全面的药物警戒评估并不支持 rFVIIa 具有更高的血栓形成安全性,并表明接受 rFVIIa 的患者发生血栓形成 AE 的风险可能高于接受 FEIBA 的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验