Suppr超能文献

不同技术在丹佛腹腔静脉分流术(PVS)治疗恶性腹水时的作用。

Role of different techniques for the placement of Denver peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) in malignant ascites.

作者信息

Clara Renzo, Righi Dorico, Bortolini Massimiliano, Cornaglia Silvia, Ruffino Maria Antonella, Zanon Claudio

机构信息

Service of Surgical Oncology and Biomedic Technologies, S. Giovanni Battista Antica Sede Hospital, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Aug;14(4):222-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sle.0000136675.54624.16.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate 3 different techniques of Denver peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) placement. Fifty-three patients with malignant ascites underwent placement of 55 Denver PVS by a surgical (33 cases) or percutaneous (18) or laparoscopically assisted (4) procedure. There were 2 cases of postoperative mortality due to cardiac failure, and 7 cases of shunt obstruction (2 of them required replacement). Twenty patients underwent subsequent palliative treatment with chemotherapy or surgery. Complication and control of ascites rates are similar for the 3 techniques. Placement of Denver PVS for the treatment of malignant ascites appears to be a safe and useful procedure. Surgical dissection of the jugular vein is not mandatory. The percutaneous technique is the easiest, fastest, and least invasive procedure. Laparoscopic-assisted positioning is recommended if a peritoneal biopsy and/or abdominal exploration is required for a definitive diagnosis.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估丹佛腹腔静脉分流术(PVS)的3种不同放置技术。53例恶性腹水患者通过手术(33例)、经皮(18例)或腹腔镜辅助(4例)手术放置了55个丹佛PVS。有2例患者因心力衰竭术后死亡,7例分流梗阻(其中2例需要更换)。20例患者随后接受了化疗或手术的姑息治疗。3种技术的并发症和腹水控制率相似。丹佛PVS用于治疗恶性腹水似乎是一种安全有效的手术。颈静脉的手术解剖并非必需。经皮技术是最简单、最快且侵入性最小的手术。如果明确诊断需要进行腹膜活检和/或腹部探查,建议采用腹腔镜辅助定位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验