Sur Dipika, Manna Byomkesh, Deb Alok K, Deen Jacqueline L, Danovaro-Holliday M Carolina, von Seidlein Lorenz, Clemens John D, Bhattacharya Sujit K
National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, P-33 CIT Road Scheme XM, Beliaghata, Kolkata 700 010, India.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2004 Jun;22(2):130-8.
In an urban slum in eastern Kolkata, India, reported diarrhoea rates, healthcare-use patterns, and factors associated with reported diarrhoea episodes were studied as a part of a diarrhoea-surveillance project. Data were collected through a structured interview during a census and healthcare-use survey of an urban slum population in Kolkata. Several variables were analyzed, including (a) individual demographics, such as age and educational level, (b) household characteristics, such as number of household members, religious affiliation of the household head, building material, expenditure, water supply and sanitation, and (c) behaviour, such as hand-washing after defecation and healthcare use. Of 57,099 study subjects, 428 (0.7%) reported a diarrhoea episode sometime during the four weeks preceding the interview. The strongest independent factors for reporting a history of diarrhoea were having another household member with diarrhoea (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-4.4) and age less than 60 months (adjusted OR=3.7; 95% CI 3.0-4.7). The first choice of treatment by the 428 subjects was as follows: 151 (35%) had self- or parent-treatment, 150 (35%) consulted a private allopathic practitioner, 70 (16%) went directly to a pharmacy, 29 (7%) visited a hospital, 14 (3%) a homoeopathic practitioner, 2 (0.5%) an ayurvedic practitioner, and 12 (3%) other traditional healers. The choices varied significantly with the age of patients and their religion. The findings increase the understanding of the factors and healthcare-use patterns associated with diarrhoea episodes and may assist in developing public-health messages and infrastructure in Kolkata.
作为腹泻监测项目的一部分,在印度加尔各答东部的一个城市贫民窟,对报告的腹泻发生率、医疗使用模式以及与报告的腹泻发作相关的因素进行了研究。数据是通过对加尔各答一个城市贫民窟人口进行普查和医疗使用调查期间的结构化访谈收集的。分析了几个变量,包括:(a) 个人人口统计学特征,如年龄和教育水平;(b) 家庭特征,如家庭成员数量、户主的宗教信仰、建筑材料、支出、供水和卫生设施;以及 (c) 行为,如排便后洗手和医疗使用情况。在57,099名研究对象中,428人(0.7%)报告在访谈前四周内的某个时间有腹泻发作。报告有腹泻病史的最强独立因素是有另一名家庭成员患有腹泻(调整后的优势比[OR]=3.8;95%置信区间[CI] 3.3-4.4)以及年龄小于60个月(调整后的OR=3.7;95% CI 3.0-4.7)。这428名受试者的首选治疗方式如下:151人(35%)进行自我治疗或由父母治疗,150人(35%)咨询私人全科医生,70人(16%)直接去药店,29人(7%)去医院就诊,14人(3%)咨询顺势疗法医生,2人(0.5%)咨询阿育吠陀医生,12人(3%)咨询其他传统治疗师。这些选择因患者年龄及其宗教信仰而有显著差异。这些发现增进了对与腹泻发作相关的因素和医疗使用模式的理解,并可能有助于在加尔各答制定公共卫生信息和基础设施。