Ng Y L, Yan R, Tsen L T S, Yong L C, Liu M, Liang D T
Institute of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Innovation Centre, Block 2 Unit 237, 18 Nanyang Drive, 637723 Singapore.
Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(4):233-40.
Fluidization finds many process applications in the areas of catalytic reactions, drying, coating, combustion, gasification and microbial culturing. This work aims to compare the dynamic adsorption characteristics and adsorption rates in a bubbling fluidized bed and a fixed bed at the same gas flow-rate, gas residence time and bed height. Adsorption with 520 ppm methanol and 489 ppm isobutane by the ZSM-5 zeolite of different particle size in the two beds enabled the differentiation of the adsorption characteristics and rates due to bed type, intraparticle mass transfer and adsorbate-adsorbent interaction. Adsorption of isobutane by the more commonly used activated carbon provided the comparison of adsorption between the two adsorbent types. With the same gas residence time of 0.79 seconds in both the bubbling bed and fixed bed of the same bed size of 40 mm diameter and 48 mm height, the experimental results showed a higher rate of adsorption in the bubbling bed as compared to the fixed bed. Intraparticle mass transfer and adsorbent-adsorbate interaction played significant roles in affecting the rate of adsorption, with intraparticle mass transfer being more dominant. The bubbling bed was observed to have a steeper decline in adsorption rate with respect to increasing outlet concentration compared to the fixed bed. The adsorption capacities of zeolite for the adsorbates studied were comparatively similar in both beds; fluidizing, and using smaller particles in the bubbling bed did not increase the adsorption capacity of the ZSM-5 zeolite. The adsorption capacity of activated carbon for isobutane was much higher than the ZSM-5 zeolite for isobutane, although at a lower adsorption rate. Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy was used as an analytical tool for the quantification of gas concentration. Calibration was done using a series of standards prepared by in situ dilution with nitrogen gas, based on the ideal gas law and relating partial pressure to gas concentration. Concentrations up to 220 ppm for methanol and 75 ppm for isobutane were prepared using this method.
流态化在催化反应、干燥、涂层、燃烧、气化和微生物培养等领域有许多工艺应用。这项工作旨在比较在相同气体流速、气体停留时间和床层高度下,鼓泡流化床和固定床中的动态吸附特性和吸附速率。在这两种床层中,使用不同粒径的ZSM-5沸石对520 ppm甲醇和489 ppm异丁烷进行吸附,能够区分由于床层类型、颗粒内传质和吸附质-吸附剂相互作用导致的吸附特性和速率。使用更常用的活性炭对异丁烷进行吸附,可比较两种吸附剂类型之间的吸附情况。在直径40 mm、高度48 mm的相同床层尺寸的鼓泡床和固定床中,气体停留时间均为0.79秒,实验结果表明,与固定床相比,鼓泡床中的吸附速率更高。颗粒内传质和吸附剂-吸附质相互作用在影响吸附速率方面发挥了重要作用,其中颗粒内传质更为显著。观察到与固定床相比,鼓泡床的吸附速率随出口浓度增加下降得更陡。在两种床层中,所研究的吸附质在沸石上的吸附容量相对相似;在鼓泡床中流化并使用较小颗粒并没有提高ZSM-5沸石的吸附容量。活性炭对异丁烷的吸附容量远高于ZSM-5沸石对异丁烷的吸附容量,尽管吸附速率较低。傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱用作定量气体浓度的分析工具。根据理想气体定律并将分压与气体浓度相关联,使用一系列通过用氮气原位稀释制备的标准物进行校准。使用此方法制备了高达220 ppm的甲醇浓度和75 ppm的异丁烷浓度。