Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤后的心理理论

Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Bibby Helen, McDonald Skye

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(1):99-114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.027.

Abstract

This study investigated whether people with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) demonstrate a specific impairment on tasks requiring them to make inferences about others' mental states (theory of mind tasks). Participants with severe TBI were compared to a healthy group on verbal first-order and second-order theory of mind (ToM) tasks, non-verbal ToM tasks and on verbal and non-verbal tasks requiring them to make general (non-mental) inferences (NMIs). The clinical group performed more poorly than controls on both ToM and NMI tasks. This performance was not completely accounted for by the working memory or implicit language demands of the tasks. Multiple regression analyses suggested that patients with TBI have a general weakness in inference-making that, combined with linguistic and working memory limitations, impairs their performance on both non-verbal and second-order ToM tasks. However, a specific ToM impairment may underlie their poor performance on verbal first-order tasks. Implications of this finding for the possibility of a separate cognitive module of ToM are discussed, as well as for the rehabilitation of social deficits after TBI.

摘要

本研究调查了重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在需要对他人心理状态进行推理的任务(心理理论任务)上是否表现出特定损伤。将重度TBI患者与健康组在言语一阶和二阶心理理论(ToM)任务、非言语ToM任务以及要求他们进行一般(非心理)推理(NMI)的言语和非言语任务上进行比较。临床组在ToM和NMI任务上的表现均比对照组差。任务的工作记忆或隐性语言要求并不能完全解释这种表现。多元回归分析表明,TBI患者在推理方面存在普遍弱点,再加上语言和工作记忆的限制,损害了他们在非言语和二阶ToM任务上的表现。然而,特定的ToM损伤可能是他们在言语一阶任务上表现不佳的原因。讨论了这一发现对是否存在单独的ToM认知模块的可能性的影响,以及对TBI后社会缺陷康复的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验