Vosman Ben, Visser Dirk, van der Voort Jeroen Rouppe, Smulders Marinus J M, van Eeuwijk Fred
Plant Research International, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Nov;109(8):1718-25. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1809-3. Epub 2004 Oct 14.
In the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants Act of 1991, mutation is mentioned as one of the mechanisms to obtain an 'essentially derived' variety (EDV). For the implementation of the EDV concept in the case of mutation, it is important that the level of genetic relatedness between an initial variety and derived mutant varieties can clearly be distinguished from the level of relatedness between arbitrary pairs of varieties without a derivation relation. Conditions to be fulfilled for such a distinction include enough genetic differentiation in the germplasm pool of interest, sufficiently low levels of genomic sampling error and technical laboratory error and high reproducibility within and between laboratories. In rose, mutants or 'sports' are frequently observed during multiplication, making it a suitable crop for studying the possibilities for introduction of the EDV concept in ornamentals. We studied genetic similarities among 83 rose varieties, including 13 mutant groups. Twelve AFLP primer combinations generated 284 polymorphic markers and 114 monomorphic (fixed) bands. Pair-wise Jaccard similarities between original varieties and derived mutants were close to 1.0 (>0.96), whereas all similarities between original varieties were below 0.80, with 75% of the non-mutant similarities even being below 0.50. Values less than 1.0 for similarity among original varieties and their mutants were to a major extent due to scoring errors. Error rates in automated scoring proved to be lower than those in manually scored and transferred data. Experimental errors, even between laboratories, turned out to be very small. On the basis of a consistent and large difference between similarities, relations between an original variety and its mutants can easily be identified and distinguished from relations between original varieties. These results open the way for implementing the essential derivation concept in rose.
在1991年的《国际植物新品种保护联盟法案》中,突变被列为获得“实质派生品种”(EDV)的机制之一。对于在突变情况下实施EDV概念而言,重要的是能够清楚地区分初始品种与派生突变品种之间的遗传相关性水平,以及任意无派生关系的品种对之间的相关性水平。进行这种区分需要满足的条件包括:在感兴趣的种质库中有足够的遗传分化、基因组抽样误差和技术实验室误差水平足够低,以及实验室内部和实验室之间具有高重现性。在玫瑰中,繁殖过程中经常会观察到突变体或“芽变”,这使得玫瑰成为研究在观赏植物中引入EDV概念可能性的合适作物。我们研究了83个玫瑰品种(包括13个突变体组)之间的遗传相似性。12对AFLP引物组合产生了284个多态性标记和114个单态(固定)条带。原始品种与派生突变体之间的成对杰卡德相似性接近1.0(>0.96),而原始品种之间的所有相似性均低于0.80,75%的非突变体相似性甚至低于0.50。原始品种及其突变体之间相似性小于1.0的值在很大程度上是由于评分误差。事实证明,自动评分的误差率低于手动评分和转录数据的误差率。即使在不同实验室之间,实验误差也非常小。基于相似性之间一致且巨大的差异,原始品种与其突变体之间的关系很容易被识别,并与原始品种之间的关系区分开来。这些结果为在玫瑰中实施实质派生概念开辟了道路。