Wild T
Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Klinische Abteilung für Allgemeinchirurgie, AKH Wien/Austria.
MMW Fortschr Med. 2003 Oct 9;145 Suppl 3:97-101.
Within the framework of the Three-Country Congress on VAC Treatment (Vacuum Assisted Closure Treatment) held on May 16/17 2003 in Salzburg, a Consensus Conference involving members of the Committees of the German and Austrian Societies for Wound Management was convened. In view of the divergence of opinion on the effectiveness of the treatment among the cost carriers, it appeared appropriate for the two Societies for Wound Healing in Germany and Austria to arrive at a consensus on the importance of and the indications for the management of wounds with the vacuum closure method. Since the first clinical applications in the nineteen-forties, both the indication spectrum and the number of applications have increased continually. In addition to diverse vacuum closure systems, there is patented computer-controlled system technology available that is established VAC treatment. Although this is a hospital-based system, it can also be used on an outpatient basis by appropriately trained physicians and nursing staff and in instructed patients. For some indications, vacuum closure and VAC management is considered the treatment of choice, since no equivalent alternative methods are available. A cost-benefit analysis shows that vacuum closure and VAC treatment is cost effective.
在2003年5月16日至17日于萨尔茨堡举行的三国负压伤口治疗大会(真空辅助闭合治疗)框架内,召开了一次由德国和奥地利伤口管理协会委员会成员参加的共识会议。鉴于成本承担方对该治疗效果存在意见分歧,德国和奥地利的两个伤口愈合协会就负压闭合方法治疗伤口的重要性及适应症达成共识显得颇为恰当。自20世纪40年代首次临床应用以来,适应症范围和应用数量都在持续增加。除了多种负压闭合系统外,还有已获专利的计算机控制系统技术用于既定的负压辅助闭合治疗。尽管这是一个基于医院的系统,但经过适当培训的医生和护理人员以及接受指导的患者也可在门诊使用。对于某些适应症,负压闭合和负压辅助闭合治疗被视为首选治疗方法,因为没有等效的替代方法。成本效益分析表明,负压闭合和负压辅助闭合治疗具有成本效益。