Suppr超能文献

对在同性恋度假胜地社区度假的男同性恋者和双性恋者进行的网络调查与纸质调查的比较。

A comparison of Web- with paper-based surveys of gay and bisexual men who vacationed in a gay resort community.

作者信息

Knapp Whittier David, Seeley Salvatore, St Lawrence Janet S

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Educ Prev. 2004 Oct;16(5):476-85. doi: 10.1521/aeap.16.5.476.48735.

Abstract

Internet Web page survey responses were compared with those collected using traditional paper-and-pencil strategies to assess relative inclusion of a geographically dispersed population and comparativeness in responses. Three hundred and seven gay or bisexual men who had vacationed in a particular gay community completed Web-based and 244 paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Each questionnaire contained the same wording and question order. More Internet respondents than paper reported bisexual identity, nonmetropolitan residence, greater numbers of nonmain male partners for unprotected anal intercourse, and alcohol use than did paper-and-pencil respondents. Few other differences were identified. Assessing the reach of survey distribution can add to our knowledge base of surveys fielded using the Internet. Similarly, examining the potential biases in modes of administering convenience surveys can assist researchers to select the survey data collection method most appropriate to their research goals and design studies to assess the effect of the methods that are used.

摘要

将互联网网页调查的回复与使用传统纸笔策略收集的回复进行比较,以评估地理上分散的人群的相对纳入情况以及回复的可比性。307名在特定同性恋社区度假的男同性恋者或双性恋者完成了基于网络的问卷调查和244份纸笔问卷调查。每份问卷的措辞和问题顺序相同。与纸笔调查的受访者相比,更多通过互联网回复的受访者报告了双性恋身份、非大都市居住情况、更多用于无保护肛交的非主要男性伴侣以及饮酒情况。几乎没有发现其他差异。评估调查分布的覆盖范围可以增加我们对使用互联网进行的调查的知识库。同样,检查便利性调查管理方式中的潜在偏差可以帮助研究人员选择最适合其研究目标的调查数据收集方法,并设计研究来评估所使用方法的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验