Suppr超能文献

退伍军人事务部质量提升研究计划信息技术论文:用于临床指南实施的信息技术:多学科利益相关者的看法

VA QUERI informatics paper: information technology for clinical guideline implementation: perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders.

作者信息

Lyons Stacie Salsbury, Tripp-Reimer Toni, Sorofman Bernard A, Dewitt Jane E, Bootsmiller Bonnie J, Vaughn Thomas E, Doebbeling Bradley N

机构信息

The University of Iowa College of Nursing, 406 Nursing Building, Iowa City, IA 52242-1121, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):64-71. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1495. Epub 2004 Oct 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This multisite study compared the perceptions of three stakeholder groups regarding information technologies as barriers to and facilitators of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

DESIGN

The study settings were 18 U.S. Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. A purposive sample of 322 individuals participated in 50 focus groups segmented by profession and included administrators, physicians, and nurses. Focus group participants were selected based on their knowledge of practice guidelines and involvement in facility-wide guideline implementation.

MEASUREMENTS

Descriptive content analysis of 1,500 pages of focus group transcripts.

RESULTS

Eighteen themes clustered into four domains. Stakeholders were similar in discussing themes in the computer function domain most frequently but divergent in other domains, with workplace factors more often discussed by administrators, system design issues discussed most by nurses, and personal concerns discussed by physicians and nurses. Physicians and nurses most often discussed barriers, whereas administrators focused most often on facilitation. Facilitators included guideline maintenance and charting formats. Barriers included resources, attitudes, time and workload, computer glitches, computer complaints, data retrieval, and order entry. Themes with dual designations included documentation, patient records, decision support, performance evaluation, CPG implementation, computer literacy, essential data, and computer accessibility.

CONCLUSION

Stakeholders share many concerns regarding the relationships between information technologies and clinical guideline use. However, administrators, physicians, and nurses hold different opinions about specific facilitators and barriers. Health professionals' disparate perceptions could undermine guideline initiatives. Implementation plans should specifically incorporate actions to address these barriers and enhance the facilitative aspects of information technologies in clinical practice guideline use.

摘要

目的

这项多中心研究比较了三个利益相关者群体对信息技术作为临床实践指南(CPG)的障碍和促进因素的看法。

设计

研究地点为美国18家退伍军人事务医疗中心。采用目的抽样法,322名个体参与了按职业划分的50个焦点小组,包括管理人员、医生和护士。焦点小组参与者是根据他们对实践指南的了解以及在全机构指南实施中的参与情况挑选出来的。

测量

对1500页焦点小组记录进行描述性内容分析。

结果

18个主题聚为四个领域。利益相关者在最常讨论计算机功能领域的主题方面相似,但在其他领域存在差异,管理人员更多讨论工作场所因素,护士最常讨论系统设计问题,医生和护士讨论个人问题。医生和护士最常讨论障碍,而管理人员最常关注促进因素。促进因素包括指南维护和图表格式。障碍包括资源、态度、时间和工作量、计算机故障、计算机投诉、数据检索和医嘱录入。具有双重属性的主题包括文档记录、患者记录、决策支持、绩效评估、CPG实施、计算机素养、基本数据和计算机可及性。

结论

利益相关者对信息技术与临床指南使用之间的关系有许多共同关注的问题。然而,管理人员、医生和护士对具体的促进因素和障碍持有不同意见。卫生专业人员的不同看法可能会破坏指南倡议。实施计划应具体纳入应对这些障碍的行动,并加强信息技术在临床实践指南使用中的促进作用。

相似文献

1
VA QUERI informatics paper: information technology for clinical guideline implementation: perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):64-71. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1495. Epub 2004 Oct 18.
2
Providers' perceptions of spinal cord injury pressure ulcer guidelines.
J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(2):117-26. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753922.
3
Computerized provider documentation: findings and implications of a multisite study of clinicians and administrators.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):718-26. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000946. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
7
Facilitators and barriers to clinical practice guideline use among nurses.
Am J Nurs. 2012 Jul;112(7):26-35; quiz 46,36. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000415957.46932.bf.
9
Value of wireless personal digital assistants for practice: perceptions of advanced practice nurses.
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02351.x.

引用本文的文献

2
Diffusion, implementation, and use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) in the Veterans Health Administration (VA).
JAMIA Open. 2019 Jun 11;2(3):312-316. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz017. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Primary Care Practices' Abilities And Challenges In Using Electronic Health Record Data For Quality Improvement.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Apr;37(4):635-643. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1254.
5
Chiropractic Integrated Care Pathway for Low Back Pain in Veterans: Results of a Delphi Consensus Process.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Feb;41(2):137-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.10.001.
9
Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):727-35. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001267. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
10
Toward an agent-based patient-physician model for the adoption of continuous glucose monitoring technology.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Mar 1;3(2):353-62. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300217.

本文引用的文献

1
Closing the gap between science and practice: the need for professional leadership.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):196-201. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.196.
2
A call to excellence.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):113-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.113.
3
The Leapfrog standards: ready to jump from marketplace to courtroom?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):46-59. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.46.
5
Current computer use by diabetes educators.
Diabetes Educ. 2001 Mar-Apr;27(2):239-44. doi: 10.1177/014572170102700210.
6
Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Sep-Oct;8(5):499-509. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080499.
8
An informatics infrastructure is essential for evidence-based practice.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):199-201. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080199.
9
New safety and error reduction standards for hospitals.
Jt Comm Perspect. 2001 Feb;21(2):1, 3.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验