Alter David A, Iron Karey, Austin Peter C, Naylor C David
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Oct;20(12):1219-28.
Survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varies with socioeconomic status. It is unknown whether these differences can be attributed, in part, to variations in the prevalence of atherogenic risk factors preceding the index AMI event.
To examine how cardiovascular risk factors varied according to person-level indicators of income and education among a cohort of younger patients (younger than 65 years of age) hospitalized with AMI in Ontario.
The Socio-Economic and Acute Myocardial Infarction study (SESAMI) prospectively assembled a cohort of 3335 patients hospitalized with AMI who consented to participate (75% consent rate) from 53 of 57 large-volume institutions (100 AMI cases per year or more) throughout Ontario between December 1, 1999, and June 1, 2002. Given the known challenges inherent in characterizing the socioeconomic status in elderly patients and the ubiquity of atherosclerosis in elderly persons, the study focused on 1635 nonelderly participants. The relationship between income or education and cardiovascular risk factors, after adjustment for age, sex, ethnoracial factors and geography (urban-rural status) was examined.
The prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, smoking and pre-existing heart disease was higher among poorer, less educated patients, as were the total number of cardiovascular risk factors. After adjusting for baseline factors, both income (adjusted OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.82, P=0.006) and education (adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.87, P=0.01) were independently associated with cardiovascular risk factors or pre-existing heart disease. There were no significant interactions between income, education and baseline cardiovascular risk.
Outcome differences across socioeconomic strata following AMI may reflect major income- and education-related differences in atherogenic risk profile.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)后的生存率因社会经济状况而异。目前尚不清楚这些差异是否部分归因于首次发生AMI事件之前致动脉粥样硬化危险因素的患病率差异。
研究安大略省因AMI住院的年轻患者(年龄小于65岁)队列中,心血管危险因素如何根据个人收入和教育指标而变化。
社会经济与急性心肌梗死研究(SESAMI)前瞻性地纳入了1999年12月1日至2002年6月1日期间安大略省57家大容量机构(每年100例或更多AMI病例)中的53家机构的3335例因AMI住院且同意参与的患者(同意率75%)。鉴于老年患者社会经济状况特征化存在的已知挑战以及老年人动脉粥样硬化的普遍性,该研究聚焦于1635名非老年参与者。在调整年龄、性别、种族因素和地理位置(城乡状况)后,研究了收入或教育与心血管危险因素之间的关系。
在较贫穷、受教育程度较低的患者中,糖尿病、高血压、吸烟和既往心脏病的患病率较高,心血管危险因素的总数也是如此。在调整基线因素后,收入(调整后的OR为0.50,95%CI为0.31至0.82,P=0.006)和教育(调整后的OR为0.52,95%CI为0.31至0.87,P=0.01)均与心血管危险因素或既往心脏病独立相关。收入、教育与基线心血管危险因素之间无显著交互作用。
AMI后社会经济阶层之间的结局差异可能反映了致动脉粥样硬化风险概况中与收入和教育相关的主要差异。