Critchley Hugo D, Taggart Peter, Sutton Peter M, Holdright Diana R, Batchvarov Velislav, Hnatkova Katerina, Malik Marek, Dolan Raymond J
Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Brain. 2005 Jan;128(Pt 1):75-85. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh324. Epub 2004 Oct 20.
Patients with specific neurological, psychiatric or cardiovascular conditions are at enhanced risk of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death. The neurogenic mechanisms are poorly understood. However, in many cases, stress may precipitate cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death in vulnerable patients, presumably via centrally driven autonomic nervous system responses. From a cardiological perspective, the likelihood of arrhythmia is strongly associated with abnormalities in electrical repolarization (recovery) of the heart muscle after each contraction. Inhomogeneous and asymmetric repolarization, reflected in ECG T-wave abnormalities, is associated with a greatly increased risk of arrhythmia, i.e. a proarrhythmic state. We therefore undertook a study to identify the brain mechanisms by which stress can induce cardiac arrhythmia through efferent autonomic drive. We recruited a typical group of 10 out-patients attending a cardiological clinic. We simultaneously measured brain activity, using H2(15)O PET, and the proarrhythmic state of the heart, using ECG, during mental and physical stress challenges and corresponding control conditions. Proarrhythmic changes in the heart were quantified from two ECG-derived measures of repolarization inhomogeneity and were related to changes in magnitude and lateralization of regional brain activity reflected in regional cerebral blood flow. Across the patient group, we observed a robust positive relationship between right-lateralized asymmetry in midbrain activity and proarrhythmic abnormalities of cardiac repolarization (apparent in two independent ECG measures) during stress. This association between stress-induced lateralization of midbrain activity and enhanced arrhythmic vulnerability provides empirical support for a putative mechanism for stress-induced sudden death, wherein lateralization of central autonomic drive during stress results in imbalanced activity in right and left cardiac sympathetic nerves. A right-left asymmetry in sympathetic drive across the surface of the heart disrupts the electrophysiological homogeneity of ventricular repolarization, predisposing to arrhythmia. Our findings highlight a proximal brain basis for stress-induced cardiac arrhythmic vulnerability.
患有特定神经、精神或心血管疾病的患者发生心律失常和猝死的风险会增加。神经源性机制尚不清楚。然而,在许多情况下,压力可能会促使易患患者发生心律失常和猝死,推测是通过中枢驱动的自主神经系统反应。从心脏病学的角度来看,心律失常的可能性与心肌每次收缩后电复极化(恢复)异常密切相关。心电图T波异常所反映的复极化不均匀和不对称与心律失常风险大幅增加有关,即促心律失常状态。因此,我们开展了一项研究,以确定压力通过传出自主神经驱动诱发心律失常的脑机制。我们招募了一组来自心脏病门诊的10名典型门诊患者。在精神和身体应激挑战以及相应的对照条件下,我们同时使用H2(15)O PET测量大脑活动,并使用心电图测量心脏的促心律失常状态。心脏的促心律失常变化通过两种源自心电图的复极化不均匀性测量方法进行量化,并与区域脑血流所反映的区域脑活动的幅度和偏侧化变化相关。在整个患者组中,我们观察到在应激期间,中脑活动的右侧偏侧化不对称与心脏复极化的促心律失常异常(在两种独立的心电图测量中明显可见)之间存在强烈的正相关关系。应激诱导的中脑活动偏侧化与心律失常易感性增强之间的这种关联为应激诱导猝死的一种假定机制提供了实证支持,即在应激期间中枢自主神经驱动的偏侧化导致左右心脏交感神经活动失衡。心脏表面交感神经驱动的左右不对称会破坏心室复极化的电生理均匀性,易引发心律失常。我们的研究结果突出了应激诱导心律失常易感性的近端脑基础。