Suppr超能文献

阿奇霉素用于治疗急性下呼吸道感染。

Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections.

作者信息

Panpanich R, Lerttrakarnnon P, Laopaiboon M

机构信息

Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Road, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD001954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001954.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of acute lower respiratory tract infection ranges from acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis to pneumonia. Annually approximately five million people die of acute respiratory tract infections. Among these, pneumonia represents the most frequent cause of mortality, hospitalization and medical consultation. Azithromycin is a new macrolide antibiotic, structurally modified from erythromycin and is noted for its activity against some gram-negative organisms associated with respiratory tract infections, particularly Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (amoxyclav) in the treatment of LRTI, in terms of clinical failure, incidence of adverse events and microbial eradication.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January Week 3, 2004), and EMBASE (January 1988 to 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials, which compared azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in patients with clinical evidence of acute LRTI: acute bronchitis, pneumonia, and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were studied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The criteria for assessing study quality were generation of allocation sequence, concealment of treatment allocation, blinding, and completeness of the trial. All types of acute lower respiratory tract infections were initially pooled in the meta-analyses. Funnel plot was used to examine publication bias. The heterogeneity of results was investigated by the forest plot and Chi-square test. Index of I(2) was also used to measure inconsistency results among trials. Subgroup analysis was conducted for age, types of respiratory tract infection and types of antibiotic in control groups. Sensitivity analysis was conducted under the condition of trial size and concealment of treatment allocation.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen trials with 2,521 enrolled patients used 2,416 patients in the analysis. A total of 1,350 patients received azithromycin and 1,066 received amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. The pooled analysis of all trials showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinical failure on about day 10 to 14 after therapy started between the two groups (relative risk (RR) (random effects) 0.96; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.57). Sensitivity analysis showed that a reduction of clinical failure in azithromycin-treated patients (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.12) in three adequately concealed studies, compared to RR 1.14 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.08) in eleven studies with inadequate concealment. Eleven trials reported the incidence of microbial eradication and there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07). The reduction of adverse events in azithromycin group was RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.00).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is unclear evidence that azithromycin is superior to amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in treating acute LRTI. Future trials with high methodological quality are needed.

摘要

背景

急性下呼吸道感染的范围从急性支气管炎、慢性支气管炎急性加重到肺炎。每年约有五百万人死于急性呼吸道感染。其中,肺炎是导致死亡、住院和就医的最常见原因。阿奇霉素是一种新型大环内酯类抗生素,由红霉素结构改造而来,以其对一些与呼吸道感染相关的革兰氏阴性菌,特别是流感嗜血杆菌的活性而闻名。

目的

比较阿奇霉素与阿莫西林或阿莫西林/克拉维酸(阿莫西林克拉维酸钾)在治疗下呼吸道感染方面的有效性,包括临床失败率、不良事件发生率和微生物清除率。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2003年第4期)、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2004年1月第3周)和EMBASE(1988年1月至2003年)。

选择标准

随机和半随机对照试验,比较阿奇霉素与阿莫西林或阿莫西林/克拉维酸在有急性下呼吸道感染临床证据的患者中的疗效:研究了急性支气管炎肺炎和慢性支气管炎急性加重。

数据收集与分析

评估研究质量的标准包括分配序列的产生、治疗分配的隐藏、盲法和试验的完整性。所有类型的急性下呼吸道感染最初都纳入荟萃分析。采用漏斗图检查发表偏倚。通过森林图和卡方检验研究结果的异质性。I(2)指数也用于衡量试验间结果的不一致性。对年龄、呼吸道感染类型和对照组抗生素类型进行亚组分析。在试验规模和治疗分配隐藏的条件下进行敏感性分析。

主要结果

14项试验共纳入2521例患者,分析时使用了2416例患者。共有1350例患者接受阿奇霉素治疗,1066例患者接受阿莫西林或阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗。所有试验的汇总分析表明,治疗开始后约10至14天,两组临床失败率无显著差异(相对危险度(RR)(随机效应)0.96;95%可信区间0.58至1.57)。敏感性分析表明,在三项隐藏充分的研究中,阿奇霉素治疗组临床失败率降低(RR 0.52;95%可信区间0.24至1.12),而在11项隐藏不充分的研究中,RR为1.14(95%可信区间0.62至2.08)。11项试验报告了微生物清除率,两组之间无显著差异(RR 0.98;95%可信区间0.91至1.07)阿奇霉素组不良事件减少的RR为0.75(95%可信区间0.56至1.00)。

综述作者结论

尚无明确证据表明阿奇霉素在治疗急性下呼吸道感染方面优于阿莫西林或阿莫西林/克拉维酸。需要开展方法学质量高的未来试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验