Clark Rebecca, Gundry Stephen W
International Development Centre, University of Oxford, Queen Elizabeth House, Oxford OX1 3LA, UK.
J Water Health. 2004 Sep;2(3):157-69.
Improved water supply, sanitation and hygiene used in combination are effective at achieving better health for poor people in developing countries. However, donor policy has been dominated by interventions in water supply, at the expense of achieving the potential health benefits of improved sanitation and hygiene. Commitments recently made by the international community require greater emphasis on improved sanitation and hygiene and their impacts on health. This review assesses whether such a shift in emphasis is apparent in donor policy. It examines the prominence given to achieving better health in water supply and sanitation policies of three donors: the World Bank, the European Union and the Department for International Development of the British Government. It finds that health benefits are explicit and integral in recently updated policy documentation concerning water supply and sanitation. This has taken place in an environment focused on poverty reduction and demand-led, financially sustainable interventions. Mechanisms that have enabled donors to prioritise the health impacts in this environment are discussed, including adoption of an asset-based conceptualisation of poverty and a cross-sectoral approach.
改善供水、环境卫生和个人卫生相结合,对于改善发展中国家贫困人口的健康状况是有效的。然而,捐助政策一直以供水干预为主导,却牺牲了改善环境卫生和个人卫生可能带来的健康益处。国际社会最近做出的承诺要求更加重视改善环境卫生和个人卫生及其对健康的影响。本综述评估了这种重点转移在捐助政策中是否明显。它考察了世界银行、欧盟和英国政府国际发展部这三个捐助方在供水和环境卫生政策中对实现更好健康状况的重视程度。研究发现,在最近更新的有关供水和环境卫生的政策文件中,健康益处是明确且不可或缺的。这一情况发生在一个以减贫为重点、需求导向且财政可持续的干预环境中。文中讨论了促使捐助方在这种环境下将健康影响列为优先事项的机制,包括采用基于资产的贫困概念化和跨部门方法。