• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《主协议和解协议》对香烟消费的影响。

The impact of the Master Settlement Agreement on cigarette consumption.

作者信息

Sloan Frank A, Trogdon Justin G

机构信息

Center for Health Policy, Law and Management, Duke University, USA.

出版信息

J Policy Anal Manage. 2004 Aug;23(4):843-55. doi: 10.1002/pam.20050.

DOI:10.1002/pam.20050
PMID:15499706
Abstract

In 1998, 46 states and the four major tobacco companies signed the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), which stipulated that the tobacco companies pay states $206 billion over 25 years and take steps to reduce youth smoking. The remaining states settled separately. We sought to determine the effect of the settlements on demand for cigarettes. Using a nationwide sample from 1990 to 2002, we estimated a model of the decision to smoke cigarettes. The settlements affected smoking primarily through price increases for cigarettes, although there was evidence that other policy instruments influenced smoking rates for younger smokers. By 2002, the settlements had reduced overall smoking rates by 13 percent for ages 18 to 20 and older than 65 and 5 percent for ages 21 to 64.

摘要

1998年,46个州与四大烟草公司签署了《主协议和解协议》(MSA),该协议规定烟草公司在25年内向各州支付2060亿美元,并采取措施减少青少年吸烟。其余各州分别达成和解。我们试图确定这些和解协议对香烟需求的影响。利用1990年至2002年的全国性样本,我们估计了一个吸烟决策模型。这些和解协议主要通过提高香烟价格来影响吸烟行为,不过有证据表明其他政策手段也对年轻吸烟者的吸烟率产生了影响。到2002年,这些和解协议使18至20岁以及65岁以上人群的总体吸烟率降低了13%,使21至64岁人群的吸烟率降低了5%。

相似文献

1
The impact of the Master Settlement Agreement on cigarette consumption.《主协议和解协议》对香烟消费的影响。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2004 Aug;23(4):843-55. doi: 10.1002/pam.20050.
2
The Master Settlement Agreement with the tobacco industry and cigarette advertising in magazines.与烟草行业的《主和解协议》及杂志中的香烟广告。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 16;345(7):504-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa003149.
3
Impacts of the Master Settlement Agreement on the tobacco industry.《主和解协议》对烟草行业的影响。
Tob Control. 2004 Dec;13(4):356-61. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.007229.
4
Do increases in cigarette prices lead to increases in sales of cigarettes with high tar and nicotine yields?香烟价格上涨会导致高焦油和高尼古丁含量香烟的销量增加吗?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Oct;9(10):1015-20. doi: 10.1080/14622200701491289.
5
After the Master Settlement Agreement: trends in the American tobacco retail environment from 1999 to 2002.《主和解协议》之后:1999年至2002年美国烟草零售环境的趋势
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Jul;5(3 Suppl):99S-110S. doi: 10.1177/1524839904264603.
6
The impact of tobacco control program expenditures on aggregate cigarette sales: 1981-2000.烟草控制项目支出对卷烟总销量的影响:1981 - 2000年
J Health Econ. 2003 Sep;22(5):843-59. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00057-2.
7
Response to increases in cigarette prices by race/ethnicity, income, and age groups--United States, 1976-1993.按种族/民族、收入和年龄组划分对香烟价格上涨的反应——美国,1976 - 1993年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 Jul 31;47(29):605-9.
8
The 1998 Master Settlement Agreement: a public health opportunity realized--or lost?1998年的《主和解协议》:一个已实现——或错失的公共卫生契机?
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Jul;5(3 Suppl):21S-32S. doi: 10.1177/1524839904264588.
9
A major state tobacco tax increase, the master settlement agreement, and cigarette consumption: the California experience.一项重大的州烟草税上调、《主和解协议》与卷烟消费:加利福尼亚州的经验
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun;95(6):1030-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042697.
10
The economic impacts of the tobacco settlement.烟草和解协议的经济影响。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2002 Winter;21(1):1-19. doi: 10.1002/pam.1037.

引用本文的文献

1
The Economics of Tobacco Regulation: A Comprehensive Review.烟草管制经济学:全面综述
J Econ Lit. 2022 Sep;60(3):883-970. doi: 10.1257/jel.20201482.
2
U.S. young adults' awareness of the Master Settlement Agreement and cigarette industry practices and their associations with electronic cigarette industry and health risk perceptions.美国年轻成年人对主要和解协议及卷烟行业做法的认知及其与电子烟行业和健康风险认知的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 31;23(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15520-2.
3
Healthy People Countdown 2030: reaching 5% cigarette smoking prevalence among US adults through state cigarette excise tax increases.
《健康人民倒计时 2030:通过提高美国各州香烟消费税使美国成年人的吸烟率降至 5%》
Tob Control. 2023 May;32(3):388-392. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056755. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
4
Reducing Harm Through Litigation Against Opioid Manufacturers? Lessons From the Tobacco Wars.通过对阿片类药物制造商提起诉讼来减少危害?烟草战争的教训。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Mar/Apr;133(2):207-213. doi: 10.1177/0033354917751131. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
5
Disparities in the Population Distribution of African American and Non-Hispanic White Smokers Along the Quitting Continuum.非裔美国吸烟者与非西班牙裔白人吸烟者在戒烟连续过程中的人群分布差异。
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Dec;42(6):742-51. doi: 10.1177/1090198115577376. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
6
Increases in light and intermittent smoking among Asian Americans and non-Hispanic Whites.亚裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人中轻度和间歇性吸烟情况有所增加。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jun;16(6):904-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu027. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
7
Unintended consequences of cigarette price changes for alcohol drinking behaviors across age groups: evidence from pooled cross sections.香烟价格变化对不同年龄组人群饮酒行为的意外后果:来自汇总横截面的证据。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012 Jul 11;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-28.
8
Impact of tobacco control interventions on smoking initiation, cessation, and prevalence: a systematic review.烟草控制干预措施对吸烟起始、戒烟和流行率的影响:系统评价。
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:961724. doi: 10.1155/2012/961724. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
9
Effects of tobacco taxation and pricing on smoking behavior in high risk populations: a knowledge synthesis.烟草税收和定价政策对高危人群吸烟行为的影响:知识综合
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Nov;8(11):4118-39. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8114118. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
10
Awareness and reported consequences of a cigarette tax increase among older adolescents and young adults.青少年和年轻成年人对香烟税增加的认知和报告后果。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(6):379-86. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090706-QUAN-215.