Dayhim Fariba, Wilkins Edwin G
Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Nov;53(5):432-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000130709.23640.60.
For the past two decades, the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap has been a mainstay of postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Because the flap depends on musculocutaneous perforating vessels from the rectus muscle for survival, some authors have raised concerns about increased risks of TRAM flap loss in patients with scars from previous abdominal surgeries, particularly those with Pfannenstiel scars. To assess the effects of Pfannenstiel scars on complication rates, we retrospectively evaluated the inpatient and outpatient records of 241 patients undergoing TRAM reconstruction in a single institution over an 11-year period. Of these patients, 51 had previous Pfannenstiel scars. while 190 did not. Controlling for potential confounding variables (body mass index and timing of reconstruction), logistic regressions found no significant differences between the Pfannenstiel and nonPfannenstiel cohorts in the rate of flap loss (15.7% and 20%, respectively; P = 0.376) or in the incidence of postoperative abdominal donor site laxity (17.6% and 12.1%, respectively; P= 0.361). Within the Pfannenstiel group, the type of TRAM reconstruction (ie, pedicle versus free flaps) did not have a significant effect on complication rates. We conclude that previous concerns over the impact of preexisting Pfannenstiel scars on TRAM flap complications are unfounded.
在过去二十年中,横行腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM瓣)一直是乳房切除术后乳房重建的主要手段。由于该皮瓣的存活依赖于来自腹直肌的肌皮穿支血管,一些作者对既往有腹部手术瘢痕的患者,尤其是有Pfannenstiel瘢痕的患者,TRAM瓣丢失风险增加表示担忧。为了评估Pfannenstiel瘢痕对并发症发生率的影响,我们回顾性评估了一家机构在11年期间接受TRAM重建的241例患者的住院和门诊记录。在这些患者中,51例有既往Pfannenstiel瘢痕,190例没有。在控制潜在混杂变量(体重指数和重建时间)后,逻辑回归分析发现,Pfannenstiel组和非Pfannenstiel组在皮瓣丢失率(分别为15.7%和20%;P = 0.376)或术后腹部供区松弛发生率(分别为17.6%和12.1%;P = 0.361)方面没有显著差异。在Pfannenstiel组中,TRAM重建的类型(即带蒂皮瓣与游离皮瓣)对并发症发生率没有显著影响。我们得出结论,既往对已存在的Pfannenstiel瘢痕对TRAM瓣并发症影响的担忧是没有根据的。