Abu-Heija A, Zayed F
Jordan University of Science and Technology and Princess Badeea Teaching Hospital, Irbid-Jordan.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Sep;18(5):432-4. doi: 10.1080/01443619866723.
In this retrospective study, we describe and compare the clinical indications of primary and repeat caesarean sections. We review caesarean deliveries at the Princess Badeea Teaching Hospital in North Jordan performed between 1 January and 26 November 1995 (n=740). The indication for the procedure was extracted based on the surgeon's operative reports. The hospital caesarean rate during the study period was 8.8%; 22.7% of these were repeat procedures (n=168). Elective caesarean delivery was the leading cause of repeat sections, followed by dystocia, others, breech and fetal distress. In contrast, breech presentation, dystocia and fetal distress were the leading indications for primary caesarean section. Ninetynine patients (59%) undergoing repeat caesarean had absolute or relative contraindication to trial of labour. The majority of primary caesarean are clinically indicated. Caesarean section rates can be lowered if we address the repeat elective procedures.
在这项回顾性研究中,我们描述并比较了初次剖宫产和再次剖宫产的临床指征。我们回顾了1995年1月1日至11月26日在约旦北部巴迪娅公主教学医院进行的剖宫产分娩情况(n = 740)。手术指征是根据外科医生的手术报告提取的。研究期间该医院的剖宫产率为8.8%;其中22.7%为再次剖宫产(n = 168)。择期剖宫产是再次剖宫产的主要原因,其次是难产、其他原因、臀位和胎儿窘迫。相比之下,臀位、难产和胎儿窘迫是初次剖宫产的主要指征。99例(59%)接受再次剖宫产的患者存在绝对或相对的阴道试产禁忌证。大多数初次剖宫产都有临床指征。如果我们处理再次择期剖宫产手术,剖宫产率可以降低。