Rayner Keith, Warren Tessa, Juhasz Barbara J, Liversedge Simon P
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Nov;30(6):1290-301. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290.
Readers' eye movements were monitored as they read sentences describing events in which an individual performed an action with an implement. The noun phrase arguments of the verbs in the sentences were such that when thematic assignment occurred at the critical target word, the sentence was plausible (likely theme), implausible (unlikely theme), or anomalous (an inappropriate theme). Whereas the target word in the anomalous condition provided evidence of immediate disruption, the effect of the target word in the implausible condition was considerably delayed. The results thus indicate that when a word is anomalous, it has an immediate effect on eye movements, but that the effect of implausibility is not as immediate.
当读者阅读描述某人用工具执行动作的事件的句子时,他们的眼睛运动受到监测。句子中动词的名词短语论据使得在关键目标词进行主题分配时,句子要么是合理的(可能的主题)、不合理的(不太可能的主题),要么是异常的(不恰当的主题)。虽然异常条件下的目标词提供了即时干扰的证据,但不合理条件下目标词的影响则会显著延迟。因此,结果表明,当一个词是异常的时候,它会对眼睛运动产生即时影响,但不合理性的影响并非如此即时。