Dehring Karen A, Workman Heather L, Miller Keith D, Mandagere Arun, Poole Salwa K
Pfizer Global Research and Development Ann Arbor Laboratories, 2800 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004 Nov 15;36(3):447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.07.022.
The ability to rapidly and consistently measure aqueous solubility in a preclinical environment is critical to the successful identification of promising discovery compounds. The advantage of an early solubility screen is timely attrition of compounds likely to fail due to poor absorption or low bioavailability before more costly screens are performed. However, due to the large number of compounds and limited sample amounts, thermodynamic solubility measurements are not feasible at this stage. A kinetic solubility measurement is an alternative to thermodynamic measurements at the discovery stage that provides a rank listing of solubility values with minimal sample requirements. A kinetic solubility measurement is attractive from an automation vantage because it features rapid data acquisition and is amenable to multi-well formats. We describe the use of a robotic liquid/plate handler coupled to nephelometry detection for the measurement of kinetic solubility. We highlight the liquid handling validation, serial dilution parameters, and a comparison to the previous method. Experiments to further enhance throughput, or increase confidence in the automation steps, are described and the effects of these experiments are presented. In our integrated nephelometry method, we observe rapid liquid handling with an error of less than 10%, after a series of validation studies, and a sample throughput up to 1800 compounds per week. We compare the nephelometry method with our semi-thermodynamic flow-injection analysis (FIA) method, and find a 75% bin agreement between the methods.
在临床前环境中快速且一致地测量水溶性的能力对于成功鉴定有前景的先导化合物至关重要。早期溶解度筛选的优势在于,在进行成本更高的筛选之前,能及时淘汰那些可能因吸收不佳或生物利用度低而失败的化合物。然而,由于化合物数量众多且样品量有限,在此阶段进行热力学溶解度测量并不可行。动力学溶解度测量是发现阶段热力学测量的一种替代方法,它能以最少的样品需求提供溶解度值的排名列表。从自动化的角度来看,动力学溶解度测量很有吸引力,因为它具有快速的数据采集能力,并且适用于多孔板形式。我们描述了使用与比浊法检测相结合的机器人液体/板处理仪来测量动力学溶解度。我们重点介绍了液体处理验证、系列稀释参数以及与先前方法的比较。还描述了进一步提高通量或增强对自动化步骤信心的实验,并展示了这些实验的效果。在我们的集成比浊法中,经过一系列验证研究后,我们观察到液体处理速度很快,误差小于10%,每周样品通量高达1800种化合物。我们将比浊法与我们的半热力学流动注射分析(FIA)方法进行比较,发现两种方法之间的分类一致性为75%。