Benazzi Franco
E. Hecker Outpatient Psychiatry Center, Ravenna, Italy.
Compr Psychiatry. 2004 Nov-Dec;45(6):441-6. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.004.
The DSM-IV-TR definition of hypomania in bipolar II disorder (BP-II) has yet to show its validity. The aim of the current study was to find the factor structure of hypomania by using DSM-IV-TR symptoms, and to assess the DSM-IV-TR definition of hypomania. One hundred ninety-seven consecutive BP-II remitted outpatients were interviewed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-CV) as modified by Benazzi and Akiskal (2003) and by Benazzi (2003), in a private practice, assessing the symptoms that were more common during past hypomanic episodes. The factor structure of hypomania was studied by principal component factor analysis. Almost all patients reported overactivity (increased goal-directed activity) during hypomania, and less commonly elevated mood. Overactivity plus three or more symptoms identified 89.3% of DSM-IV-TR BP-II. Factor analysis found three factors: factor 1, including racing thoughts ("mental activation"); factor 2, including elevated mood ("high mood"); and factor 3, including overactivity ("behavioral activation"). Elevated mood was correlated only with two of the nine DSM-IV-TR hypomanic symptoms. The three-domains structure of hypomania by Kraepelin (i.e., increased mood, thought, and activity) was found in the DSM-IV-TR definition of hypomania, partly supporting its list of symptoms. However, DSM-IV-TR priority given to mood change for the diagnosis of hypomania was not supported. An upgrading of overactivity to at least a priority level similar to mood change was supported by (1) its high frequency, (2) its utility to diagnose BP-II, and (3) by factor analysis showing that elevated mood (the "prototypical" symptom of hypomania in DSM-IV-TR) correlated with few symptoms, and that three factors (of which only one included elevated mood) were present.
双相 II 型障碍(BP-II)中轻躁狂的 DSM-IV-TR 定义尚未证明其有效性。本研究的目的是利用 DSM-IV-TR 症状找出轻躁狂的因素结构,并评估 DSM-IV-TR 对轻躁狂的定义。在私人诊所中,对 197 名连续处于缓解期的 BP-II 门诊患者进行了访谈,采用经贝纳齐和阿基斯卡尔(2003 年)以及贝纳齐(2003 年)修改的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)结构化临床访谈(SCID-CV),评估过去轻躁狂发作期间更常见的症状。通过主成分因子分析研究轻躁狂的因素结构。几乎所有患者在轻躁狂期间都报告有活动增多(目标导向活动增加),而情绪高涨则较少见。活动增多加上三种或更多症状可识别出 89.3%的 DSM-IV-TR BP-II。因子分析发现了三个因素:因素 1,包括思维奔逸(“精神激活”);因素 2,包括情绪高涨(“情绪高涨”);因素 3,包括活动增多(“行为激活”)。情绪高涨仅与 DSM-IV-TR 的九种轻躁狂症状中的两种相关。在 DSM-IV-TR 对轻躁狂的定义中发现了克雷佩林提出的轻躁狂的三领域结构(即情绪、思维和活动增加),部分支持了其症状列表。然而,DSM-IV-TR 将情绪变化作为轻躁狂诊断的首要标准并未得到支持。将活动增多提升至至少与情绪变化相似的优先级别得到了以下支持:(1)其高频率,(2)其对诊断 BP-II 的效用,以及(3)因子分析表明情绪高涨(DSM-IV-TR 中轻躁狂的“典型”症状)与很少的症状相关,并且存在三个因素(其中只有一个包括情绪高涨)。