Arora Ashoni, Moeller Larry, Froeschle James
Aventis Pasteur, Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA, USA.
J Travel Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;11(4):195-9. doi: 10.2310/7060.2004.19001.
Although human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV) has been available for over two decades and has a proven record of efficacy, it is very expensive to produce and can only be made in small quantities.
In this trial, we compared the safety and immunogenicity of a new, chromatographically purified rabies vaccine (CPRV) with those of HDCV. One hundred and thirty-five healthy veterinary students were randomized in a 2:1 ratio between CPRV and HDCV respectively. Each student subsequently received an intramuscular injection of 0.5 mL of CPRV or 1mL of HDCV on days 0, 7, and 28, according to the standard preexposure regimen. Local safety data were collected for 7 days following each dose and systemic safety data for 42 days following the first dose. Vaccine administration and safety evaluation were performed by different site personnel. Sera for immunogenicity analysis were collected on days 0 (prevaccination), 28 and 42.
All subjects achieved an antirabies antibody titer greater than or equal to the World Health Organization (WHO) accepted threshold level of seroconversion of 0.5 IU/mL after only two of three doses of vaccine in both groups. The geometric mean titers (IU/mL) in the CPRV and HDCV groups respectively were 6.54 (range 0.50 to 64.80) and 10.22 (range 0.70 to 51.40) on day 28, and 40.51 (range 5.40 to 278.00) and 37.71 (range 5.40 to 278.00) on day 42. The percentage of subjects experiencing local reactions within 3 days after any dose ranged from 65.2% to 80.9% in the CPRV group and from 77.3% to 84.4% in the HDCV group. The local reaction reported by the greatest percentage of subjects after each dose was pain/tenderness at the injection site, and most reactions were mild. Most of the reported local reactions resolved within 0 to 3 days postvaccination. Systemic reactions decreased from 76.4% after dose 1 to 36.0% after dose 3 in the CPRV group, and similarly from 55.6% to 31.8% in the HDCV group. For all postdose periods, the systemic reaction reported by the highest percentage of subjects was myalgia. No subjects experienced an immediate local or systemic reaction.
In healthy adults, vaccination with CPRV using a preexposure schedule resulted in a safety and immunogenicity profile similar to that of HDCV.
尽管人二倍体细胞疫苗(HDCV)已上市二十多年且有经证实的疗效记录,但生产成本非常高,且只能少量生产。
在本试验中,我们比较了一种新的经色谱纯化的狂犬病疫苗(CPRV)与HDCV的安全性和免疫原性。135名健康的兽医专业学生按2:1的比例分别随机分配至CPRV组和HDCV组。随后,根据标准的暴露前免疫程序,每位学生在第0、7和28天分别接受0.5 mL CPRV或1mL HDCV的肌肉注射。每次注射后收集7天的局部安全性数据,首次注射后收集42天的全身安全性数据。疫苗接种和安全性评估由不同地点的人员进行。在第0天(接种前)、28天和42天收集用于免疫原性分析的血清。
两组中所有受试者仅在接种三剂疫苗中的两剂后,抗狂犬病抗体滴度均达到或高于世界卫生组织(WHO)认可的血清转化阈值水平0.5 IU/mL。在第28天,CPRV组和HDCV组的几何平均滴度(IU/mL)分别为6.54(范围0.50至64.80)和10.22(范围0.70至51.40),在第42天分别为40.51(范围5.40至278.00)和37.71(范围5.40至278.00)。CPRV组在任何一剂后3天内出现局部反应的受试者百分比为65.2%至80.9%,HDCV组为77.3%至84.4%。每次注射后报告局部反应的受试者比例最高的是注射部位疼痛/压痛,且大多数反应为轻度。大多数报告的局部反应在接种疫苗后0至3天内消退。CPRV组的全身反应从第1剂后的76.4%降至第3剂后的36.0%,HDCV组同样从55.6%降至31.8%。在所有注射后时间段,报告全身反应的受试者比例最高的是肌痛。没有受试者出现即刻局部或全身反应。
在健康成年人中,按照暴露前免疫程序接种CPRV产生的安全性和免疫原性与HDCV相似。