Chatzinikolaou Ioannis, Hanna Hend, Hachem Ray, Alakech Badie, Tarrand Jeffrey, Raad Issam
The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Nov;50(3):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.07.007.
We prospectively evaluated the value of two levels of differential quantitative blood culture (DQBC) ratio (> or =2:1 or > or =5:1) in diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients with malignancy that have short-term and long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) (<30 and > or =30 days of placement). Diagnosis of CRBSIs was based on results of semiquantitative cultures of removed catheters. For short-term CVCs a 5:1 or greater DQBC ratio had an 18% sensitivity, 67% specificity, 18% positive predictive value (PPV) and 67% negative predictive value (NPV), whereas a 2:1 or greater cut-off point for the DQBC was associated with a 45% sensitivity, 48% specificity, 26% PPV, and 68% NPV for the diagnosis of CRBSIs. For long-term CVCs, a cut-off point of 5:1 or greater of the DQBC had an 81% sensitivity, 40% specificity, 36% PPV, and 83% NPV for the diagnosis of CRBSIa, whereas a 2:1 or greater cut-off point had a 90% sensitivity, 30% specificity, 35% PPV, and 88% NPV for the diagnosis of CRBSIs. In conclusion, DQBCs are not diagnostic of CRBSIs for short-term CVCs. In long-term CVCs, DQBCs at 2:1 or greater or 5:1 or greater are sensitive but associated with low specificity and positive predictive value.
我们前瞻性地评估了两个水平的差异定量血培养(DQBC)比值(≥2:1或≥5:1)在诊断患有恶性肿瘤且置有短期和长期中心静脉导管(CVC)(置管时间<30天和≥30天)的患者导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)中的价值。CRBSI的诊断基于拔除导管的半定量培养结果。对于短期CVC,DQBC比值为5:1或更高时,灵敏度为18%,特异度为67%,阳性预测值(PPV)为18%,阴性预测值(NPV)为67%;而DQBC的截断点为2:1或更高时,诊断CRBSI的灵敏度为45%,特异度为48%,PPV为26%,NPV为68%。对于长期CVC,DQBC截断点为5:1或更高时,诊断CRBSI的灵敏度为81%,特异度为40%,PPV为36%,NPV为83%;而截断点为2:1或更高时,诊断CRBSI的灵敏度为90%,特异度为30%,PPV为35%,NPV为88%。总之,DQBC对短期CVC的CRBSI无诊断价值。对于长期CVC,DQBC为2:1或更高或5:1或更高时具有较高灵敏度,但特异度和阳性预测值较低。