Lee Sang-Ho, Choi Won-Gyu, Lim Sang-Rak, Kang Ho-Yeong, Shin Song-Woo
Wooridul Spine Hospital, 47-4 Chungdam-Dong, Kangnam-Gu, Seoul 135-100, Korea.
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):644-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.012.
Most surgeons have thought that posterior decompression is necessary to treat isthmic spondylolisthesis with leg pain. However, the surgical procedure not only requires wide muscle dissection but can also lead to spinal instability. The authors' treatment concept for isthmic spondylolisthesis is one-stage anterior reduction and posterior stabilization with minimally invasive surgical procedure without touching the spinal thecal sac and nerve.
To investigate a new surgical concept of minimally invasive anterior-posterior fusion without posterior decompression for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis with leg pain.
This is a retrospective study of 73 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini-ALIF) followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PF) between October 2000 and February 2002.
A total of 73 patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (46 with Grade 1 and 27 with Grade 2) who underwent mini-ALIF followed by percutaneous PF were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 men and 53 women, with a mean age of 50.6 (range, 19 to 77) years. All patients had low back pain and referred or radicular leg pain or neurogenic intermittent claudication in walking or standing. Average duration of symptoms was 26 (range, 3 to 120) months.
The clinical outcome was graded according to the modified Macnab criteria.
The authors retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiological data of 73 patients who had isthmic spondylolisthesis. All patients underwent mini-ALIF and percutaneous PF on the same day between October 2000 and February 2002. The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range, 12 to 26).
The mean operating time, blood loss and hospital stay were 210 minutes, 135 ml and 4.1 days, respectively. No blood transfusion was necessary. Clinical outcome was excellent in 26 patients (35.6%), good in 43 (58.9%), fair in 3 (4.1%) and poor in 1 (1.4%). The fusion rate was 97.3% (71 of 73). There were 6 cases (8.2%) of mini-ALIF complications and 6 (8.2%) of percutaneous PF complications. There were no postoperative neurologic deficits.
Mini-ALIF followed by percutaneous PF is an efficacious alternative for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis, and posterior decompression is not necessary to relieve leg symptoms. This minimally invasive combined procedure offers many advantages, such as preservation of posterior arch, no nerve retraction, less blood loss, excellent cosmetic results, high fusion rate and early discharge.
大多数外科医生认为,对于伴有腿部疼痛的峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症,进行后路减压是必要的。然而,该手术不仅需要广泛的肌肉剥离,还可能导致脊柱不稳定。作者对于峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症的治疗理念是采用一期前路复位和后路稳定术,通过微创手术,不触及脊髓硬膜囊和神经。
探讨一种新的微创前后路融合术,不进行后路减压,用于治疗伴有腿部疼痛的峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症。
这是一项回顾性研究,对2000年10月至2002年2月期间接受微创前路腰椎椎间融合术(mini-ALIF)并随后行经皮椎弓根螺钉固定(PF)的73例峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症患者进行研究。
对73例低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症患者(46例为1级,27例为2级)进行回顾性分析,这些患者接受了mini-ALIF并随后行经皮PF。其中男性20例,女性53例,平均年龄50.6岁(范围19至77岁)。所有患者均有下腰痛,并伴有腿部牵涉痛或神经根性疼痛,或行走或站立时出现神经源性间歇性跛行。症状平均持续时间为26个月(范围3至120个月)。
根据改良Macnab标准对临床结果进行分级。
作者回顾性分析了73例峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症患者的临床和放射学数据。所有患者在2000年10月至2002年2月期间的同一天接受了mini-ALIF和经皮PF。平均随访期为16个月(范围12至26个月)。
平均手术时间、失血量和住院时间分别为210分钟、135毫升和4.1天。无需输血。临床结果优26例(35.6%),良43例(58.9%),可3例(4.1%),差1例(1.4%)。融合率为97.3%(73例中的71例)。mini-ALIF并发症有6例(8.2%),经皮PF并发症有6例(8.2%)。无术后神经功能缺损。
mini-ALIF联合经皮PF是低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱症的有效替代方法,且无需后路减压来缓解腿部症状。这种微创联合手术具有许多优点,如保留后弓、不牵拉神经、失血量少、美容效果好、融合率高和早期出院。