Suppr超能文献

我们遗漏了什么吗?开展关于损耗的研究。

Are we missing anything? Pursuing research on attrition.

作者信息

Marcellus Lenora

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Nurs Res. 2004 Sep;36(3):82-98.

Abstract

Attrition, or loss of participants over the course of a study, presents a significant threat to the integrity of a longitudinal research study and theory development resulting from the study. Although there has been a recent resurgence of interest in attrition, it is an underreported and understudied phenomenon despite its potential to introduce bias. Internal and external validity, reliability, and statistical validity are all impacted by a small sample and, most likely, a non-randomness in the study sample. Development of a theory of attrition will assist researchers in development of sampling strategies that will enhance the quality of their data in longitudinal designs. An ecological theoretical model of research participation is proposed and described.

摘要

损耗,即研究过程中参与者的流失,对纵向研究的完整性以及该研究产生的理论发展构成重大威胁。尽管最近对损耗的兴趣再度兴起,但它仍是一个报道不足且研究较少的现象,尽管其有可能引入偏差。内部和外部效度、信度以及统计效度都会受到小样本的影响,而且研究样本很可能存在非随机性。损耗理论的发展将有助于研究人员制定抽样策略,从而提高纵向设计中数据的质量。本文提出并描述了一个关于研究参与的生态理论模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验